Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Low income
Low income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual was -4.97 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
-4.97 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 79.0%
Rank
21st
of 46 groups
All-time high
194.83 % change on previous year
in 1972
All-time low
-81.65 % change on previous year
in 1970
Years of data
60
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Low income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Low income stood at -4.97 % change on previous year.
That represents a change of up 79.0% on the previous year and down 131.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Low income peaked at 194.83 % change on previous year in 1972 and was at its lowest, -81.65 % change on previous year, in 1970.
That places Low income 21st out of 46 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Low income, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 44.44 % change on previous year | — |
| 1962 | 58.97 % change on previous year | +32.7% |
| 1963 | 138.71 % change on previous year | +135.2% |
| 1964 | 10.81 % change on previous year | -92.2% |
| 1965 | 8.54 % change on previous year | -21.0% |
| 1968 | 75.57 % change on previous year | +785.2% |
| 1969 | -1.39 % change on previous year | -101.8% |
| 1970 | -81.65 % change on previous year | +5767.4% |
| 1971 | -36.26 % change on previous year | -55.6% |
| 1972 | 194.83 % change on previous year | -637.3% |
| 1973 | -15.5 % change on previous year | -108.0% |
| 1974 | -32.18 % change on previous year | +107.7% |
| 1976 | 26.75 % change on previous year | -183.1% |
| 1977 | 50.53 % change on previous year | +88.9% |
| 1978 | -2.89 % change on previous year | -105.7% |
| 1979 | 65.53 % change on previous year | -2364.7% |
| 1980 | -9.03 % change on previous year | -113.8% |
| 1981 | -10.63 % change on previous year | +17.8% |
| 1982 | 21.08 % change on previous year | -298.2% |
| 1983 | -19.4 % change on previous year | -192.0% |
| 1984 | -17.56 % change on previous year | -9.5% |
| 1985 | 7.41 % change on previous year | -142.2% |
| 1986 | 82.02 % change on previous year | +1007.4% |
| 1987 | -6.03 % change on previous year | -107.4% |
| 1988 | 95.97 % change on previous year | -1691.0% |
| 1989 | -6.79 % change on previous year | -107.1% |
| 1990 | 27.26 % change on previous year | -501.3% |
| 1991 | 25.84 % change on previous year | -5.2% |
| 1992 | -29.13 % change on previous year | -212.7% |
| 1993 | -15.12 % change on previous year | -48.1% |
| 1994 | 16.71 % change on previous year | -210.5% |
| 1995 | -11.84 % change on previous year | -170.9% |
| 1996 | 12.82 % change on previous year | -208.2% |
| 1997 | -10.19 % change on previous year | -179.5% |
| 1998 | -20.13 % change on previous year | +97.5% |
| 1999 | 22.37 % change on previous year | -211.2% |
| 2000 | 2.72 % change on previous year | -87.8% |
| 2001 | 2.31 % change on previous year | -15.3% |
| 2002 | 14.52 % change on previous year | +529.0% |
| 2003 | 123.99 % change on previous year | +754.0% |
| 2004 | -19.8 % change on previous year | -116.0% |
| 2005 | 16.59 % change on previous year | -183.8% |
| 2006 | 16.59 % change on previous year | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 13.26 % change on previous year | -20.1% |
| 2008 | 14.6 % change on previous year | +10.1% |
| 2009 | -5.54 % change on previous year | -138.0% |
| 2010 | 3.2 % change on previous year | -157.7% |
| 2011 | 64.64 % change on previous year | +1921.4% |
| 2012 | -24.68 % change on previous year | -138.2% |
| 2013 | 15.89 % change on previous year | -164.4% |
| 2014 | -3.05 % change on previous year | -119.2% |
| 2015 | -21.91 % change on previous year | +619.0% |
| 2016 | 1.3 % change on previous year | -105.9% |
| 2017 | 13.03 % change on previous year | +905.9% |
| 2018 | 26.36 % change on previous year | +102.3% |
| 2019 | -3.8 % change on previous year | -114.4% |
| 2020 | 3.78 % change on previous year | -199.3% |
| 2021 | 22.84 % change on previous year | +504.8% |
| 2022 | -23.68 % change on previous year | -203.7% |
| 2023 | -4.97 % change on previous year | -79.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 47.95 % change on previous year | -1.39 % change on previous year | 138.71 % change on previous year | 7 |
| 1970s | 18.79 % change on previous year | -81.65 % change on previous year | 194.83 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1980s | 13.7 % change on previous year | -19.4 % change on previous year | 95.97 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.86 % change on previous year | -29.13 % change on previous year | 27.26 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 17.92 % change on previous year | -19.8 % change on previous year | 123.99 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 7.1 % change on previous year | -24.68 % change on previous year | 64.64 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.5089 % change on previous year | -23.68 % change on previous year | 22.84 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low income
- 18 Chad 60.12 % change on previous year compare
- 19 Botswana 59.46 % change on previous year compare
- 20 Lesotho 56.74 % change on previous year compare
- 21 Papua New Guinea 52.14 % change on previous year compare
- 22 Nicaragua 46.02 % change on previous year compare
- 23 Lebanon 43.12 % change on previous year compare
- 24 Malawi 41.6 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 57.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 350.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 677.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.08 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 483.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.77 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 807.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 919.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 202.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 905.72 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Low income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Low income was -4.97 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in Low income?
- The highest recorded value was 194.83 % change on previous year in 1972.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in Low income?
- The lowest recorded value was -81.65 % change on previous year in 1970.
- How does Low income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual?
- Low income ranks 21st out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual rising or falling in Low income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 131.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 60 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.