Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual was 13.61 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
13.61 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 52.4%
Rank
8th
of 46 groups
All-time high
315.19 % change on previous year
in 1970
All-time low
-75.93 % change on previous year
in 1968
Years of data
59
1963–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Upper middle income, 1963–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Upper middle income stood at 13.61 % change on previous year.
The figure is down 52.4% on the previous year and up 417.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Upper middle income peaked at 315.19 % change on previous year in 1970 and was at its lowest, -75.93 % change on previous year, in 1968.
Upper middle income ranks 8th of 46 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1963 | 33.33 % change on previous year | — |
| 1964 | 285 % change on previous year | +755.0% |
| 1965 | -74.46 % change on previous year | -126.1% |
| 1968 | -75.93 % change on previous year | +2.0% |
| 1969 | 203.85 % change on previous year | -368.5% |
| 1970 | 315.19 % change on previous year | +54.6% |
| 1971 | 31.1 % change on previous year | -90.1% |
| 1972 | -21.86 % change on previous year | -170.3% |
| 1973 | 114.29 % change on previous year | -622.8% |
| 1974 | 171.25 % change on previous year | +49.8% |
| 1975 | -1.84 % change on previous year | -101.1% |
| 1976 | 27.39 % change on previous year | -1585.7% |
| 1977 | 31.53 % change on previous year | +15.1% |
| 1978 | -10.68 % change on previous year | -133.9% |
| 1979 | 19.62 % change on previous year | -283.8% |
| 1980 | 26.11 % change on previous year | +33.0% |
| 1981 | -20.93 % change on previous year | -180.2% |
| 1982 | -17.68 % change on previous year | -15.5% |
| 1983 | -0.071 % change on previous year | -99.6% |
| 1984 | -17.83 % change on previous year | +25017.8% |
| 1985 | 32.81 % change on previous year | -284.0% |
| 1986 | 50.91 % change on previous year | +55.1% |
| 1987 | 14.26 % change on previous year | -72.0% |
| 1988 | 46.14 % change on previous year | +223.6% |
| 1989 | 8.27 % change on previous year | -82.1% |
| 1990 | 41.28 % change on previous year | +399.3% |
| 1991 | -23.86 % change on previous year | -157.8% |
| 1992 | 38.74 % change on previous year | -262.4% |
| 1993 | 26.14 % change on previous year | -32.5% |
| 1994 | 37.16 % change on previous year | +42.2% |
| 1995 | -11.46 % change on previous year | -130.8% |
| 1996 | 17.57 % change on previous year | -253.3% |
| 1997 | -3.61 % change on previous year | -120.6% |
| 1998 | -36.68 % change on previous year | +915.1% |
| 1999 | 26.12 % change on previous year | -171.2% |
| 2000 | -4.76 % change on previous year | -118.2% |
| 2001 | 2.32 % change on previous year | -148.8% |
| 2002 | -12.72 % change on previous year | -646.9% |
| 2003 | 32.98 % change on previous year | -359.4% |
| 2004 | 24.99 % change on previous year | -24.2% |
| 2005 | 6.97 % change on previous year | -72.1% |
| 2006 | 122.25 % change on previous year | +1654.9% |
| 2007 | -44.91 % change on previous year | -136.7% |
| 2008 | 3.83 % change on previous year | -108.5% |
| 2009 | -4.23 % change on previous year | -210.5% |
| 2010 | -4.1 % change on previous year | -3.0% |
| 2011 | 23.07 % change on previous year | -662.2% |
| 2012 | -10.45 % change on previous year | -145.3% |
| 2013 | -4.28 % change on previous year | -59.0% |
| 2014 | 0.9885 % change on previous year | -123.1% |
| 2015 | -27.3 % change on previous year | -2861.4% |
| 2016 | 11.63 % change on previous year | -142.6% |
| 2017 | 3.14 % change on previous year | -73.0% |
| 2018 | 8.77 % change on previous year | +179.3% |
| 2019 | -0.1731 % change on previous year | -102.0% |
| 2020 | 8.26 % change on previous year | -4870.7% |
| 2021 | 15.61 % change on previous year | +89.0% |
| 2022 | 28.62 % change on previous year | +83.4% |
| 2023 | 13.61 % change on previous year | -52.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 74.36 % change on previous year | -75.93 % change on previous year | 285 % change on previous year | 5 |
| 1970s | 67.6 % change on previous year | -21.86 % change on previous year | 315.19 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 12.2 % change on previous year | -20.93 % change on previous year | 50.91 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 11.14 % change on previous year | -36.68 % change on previous year | 41.28 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 12.67 % change on previous year | -44.91 % change on previous year | 122.25 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1291 % change on previous year | -27.3 % change on previous year | 23.07 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 16.53 % change on previous year | 8.26 % change on previous year | 28.62 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 5 Bulgaria 263.64 % change on previous year compare
- 6 Djibouti 249.35 % change on previous year compare
- 7 Dominican Republic 206.44 % change on previous year compare
- 8 Hungary 205.71 % change on previous year compare
- 9 Israel 180 % change on previous year compare
- 10 Türkiye 168.24 % change on previous year compare
- 11 Argentina 119.68 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Upper middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 264.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 114.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.36 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 24.06 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 518.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.80 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 607.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 175.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.85 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Upper middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual in Upper middle income was 13.61 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 315.19 % change on previous year in 1970.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was -75.93 % change on previous year in 1968.
- How does Upper middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual?
- Upper middle income ranks 8th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), annual rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 417.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.