Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps was 69.09 million current US$ in 2022. ▲ Rising
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) recorded 69.09 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in 2022.
That represents a change of down 26.4% on the previous year and down 31.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 152.64 million current US$ in 1992 and was at its lowest, 190,000 current US$, in 1970.
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 36th of 46 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 53 years of available data.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 190,000 current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 4.66 million current US$ | +2352.6% |
| 1972 | 3.51 million current US$ | -24.7% |
| 1973 | 22.93 million current US$ | +553.3% |
| 1974 | 17.25 million current US$ | -24.8% |
| 1975 | 52.08 million current US$ | +201.9% |
| 1976 | 90.44 million current US$ | +73.7% |
| 1977 | 119.40 million current US$ | +32.0% |
| 1978 | 86.88 million current US$ | -27.2% |
| 1979 | 81.46 million current US$ | -6.2% |
| 1980 | 112.01 million current US$ | +37.5% |
| 1981 | 86.73 million current US$ | -22.6% |
| 1982 | 80.79 million current US$ | -6.8% |
| 1983 | 59.55 million current US$ | -26.3% |
| 1984 | 72.94 million current US$ | +22.5% |
| 1985 | 55.58 million current US$ | -23.8% |
| 1986 | 82.41 million current US$ | +48.3% |
| 1987 | 62.98 million current US$ | -23.6% |
| 1988 | 101.35 million current US$ | +60.9% |
| 1989 | 93.68 million current US$ | -7.6% |
| 1990 | 118.60 million current US$ | +26.6% |
| 1991 | 97.20 million current US$ | -18.0% |
| 1992 | 152.64 million current US$ | +57.0% |
| 1993 | 131.71 million current US$ | -13.7% |
| 1994 | 95.53 million current US$ | -27.5% |
| 1995 | 88.89 million current US$ | -7.0% |
| 1996 | 135.26 million current US$ | +52.2% |
| 1997 | 105.30 million current US$ | -22.1% |
| 1998 | 82.65 million current US$ | -21.5% |
| 1999 | 69.40 million current US$ | -16.0% |
| 2000 | 96.48 million current US$ | +39.0% |
| 2001 | 89.22 million current US$ | -7.5% |
| 2002 | 74.71 million current US$ | -16.3% |
| 2003 | 99.62 million current US$ | +33.3% |
| 2004 | 123.53 million current US$ | +24.0% |
| 2005 | 122.69 million current US$ | -0.7% |
| 2006 | 141.70 million current US$ | +15.5% |
| 2007 | 147.70 million current US$ | +4.2% |
| 2008 | 144.86 million current US$ | -1.9% |
| 2009 | 124.72 million current US$ | -13.9% |
| 2010 | 92.22 million current US$ | -26.1% |
| 2011 | 102.35 million current US$ | +11.0% |
| 2012 | 100.56 million current US$ | -1.7% |
| 2013 | 127.90 million current US$ | +27.2% |
| 2014 | 92.58 million current US$ | -27.6% |
| 2015 | 62.85 million current US$ | -32.1% |
| 2016 | 77.40 million current US$ | +23.2% |
| 2017 | 88.30 million current US$ | +14.1% |
| 2018 | 89.27 million current US$ | +1.1% |
| 2019 | 72.48 million current US$ | -18.8% |
| 2020 | 77.03 million current US$ | +6.3% |
| 2021 | 93.86 million current US$ | +21.8% |
| 2022 | 69.09 million current US$ | -26.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 47.88 million current US$ | 190,000 current US$ | 119.40 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 80.80 million current US$ | 55.58 million current US$ | 112.01 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 107.72 million current US$ | 69.40 million current US$ | 152.64 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 116.52 million current US$ | 74.71 million current US$ | 147.70 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 90.59 million current US$ | 62.85 million current US$ | 127.90 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 79.99 million current US$ | 69.09 million current US$ | 93.86 million current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- 33 Lebanon 15.15 million current US$ compare
- 34 Central African Republic 15.07 million current US$ compare
- 35 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 14.94 million current US$ compare
- 36 Serbia 14.62 million current US$ compare
- 37 Armenia 14.03 million current US$ compare
- 38 Kosovo 13.36 million current US$ compare
- 39 Guatemala 12.79 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 24.48 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 12.89 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 78.05 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 507.00 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 114.85 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.36 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 35.33 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 139.25 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -13.95 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.26 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) was 69.09 million current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 152.64 million current US$ in 1992.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was 190,000 current US$ in 1970.
- How does East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps?
- East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 36th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), gaps rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 31.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) with 332 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.