Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 0.8642 current US$ per person in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, 1967–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per person.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the stood at 0.8642 current US$ per person.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.0% on the previous year and down 21.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the peaked at 3.37 current US$ per person in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.0053 current US$ per person, in 1968.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 34th of 142 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, year by year
| Year | current US$ per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1967 | 0.007 current US$ per person | — |
| 1968 | 0.0053 current US$ per person | -25.3% |
| 1969 | 0.0061 current US$ per person | +16.6% |
| 1971 | 0.0077 current US$ per person | +26.1% |
| 1972 | 0.0193 current US$ per person | +149.6% |
| 1973 | 0.0142 current US$ per person | -26.4% |
| 1979 | 0.0591 current US$ per person | +316.2% |
| 1980 | 0.076 current US$ per person | +28.6% |
| 1981 | 0.0211 current US$ per person | -72.2% |
| 1982 | 0.0353 current US$ per person | +67.3% |
| 1983 | 0.0383 current US$ per person | +8.5% |
| 1991 | 0.1495 current US$ per person | +290.5% |
| 1992 | 0.0367 current US$ per person | -75.4% |
| 1993 | 0.0831 current US$ per person | +126.5% |
| 1994 | 0.0957 current US$ per person | +15.1% |
| 1995 | 0.09 current US$ per person | -5.9% |
| 1996 | 0.0985 current US$ per person | +9.4% |
| 1997 | 0.146 current US$ per person | +48.3% |
| 1998 | 0.089 current US$ per person | -39.0% |
| 1999 | 0.1901 current US$ per person | +113.6% |
| 2000 | 0.1523 current US$ per person | -19.9% |
| 2001 | 0.1047 current US$ per person | -31.2% |
| 2002 | 0.1431 current US$ per person | +36.6% |
| 2003 | 3.09 current US$ per person | +2059.3% |
| 2004 | 0.4088 current US$ per person | -86.8% |
| 2005 | 0.4034 current US$ per person | -1.3% |
| 2006 | 0.6596 current US$ per person | +63.5% |
| 2007 | 0.5344 current US$ per person | -19.0% |
| 2008 | 1.06 current US$ per person | +97.5% |
| 2009 | 0.9283 current US$ per person | -12.0% |
| 2010 | 1.04 current US$ per person | +12.3% |
| 2011 | 3.37 current US$ per person | +223.0% |
| 2012 | 1.04 current US$ per person | -69.0% |
| 2013 | 1.1 current US$ per person | +4.8% |
| 2014 | 0.7842 current US$ per person | -28.4% |
| 2015 | 0.6593 current US$ per person | -15.9% |
| 2016 | 0.6351 current US$ per person | -3.7% |
| 2017 | 0.7703 current US$ per person | +21.3% |
| 2018 | 0.8798 current US$ per person | +14.2% |
| 2019 | 0.8157 current US$ per person | -7.3% |
| 2020 | 0.7839 current US$ per person | -3.9% |
| 2021 | 1.16 current US$ per person | +48.3% |
| 2022 | 0.8388 current US$ per person | -27.9% |
| 2023 | 0.8642 current US$ per person | +3.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0061 current US$ per person | 0.0053 current US$ per person | 0.007 current US$ per person | 3 |
| 1970s | 0.0251 current US$ per person | 0.0077 current US$ per person | 0.0591 current US$ per person | 4 |
| 1980s | 0.0427 current US$ per person | 0.0211 current US$ per person | 0.076 current US$ per person | 4 |
| 1990s | 0.1087 current US$ per person | 0.0367 current US$ per person | 0.1901 current US$ per person | 9 |
| 2000s | 0.7479 current US$ per person | 0.1047 current US$ per person | 3.09 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.11 current US$ per person | 0.6351 current US$ per person | 3.37 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.9124 current US$ per person | 0.7839 current US$ per person | 1.16 current US$ per person | 4 |
Countries ranked near Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- 31 Uganda 0.9354 current US$ per person compare
- 32 Cambodia 0.9294 current US$ per person compare
- 33 Djibouti 0.9128 current US$ per person compare
- 35 Tanzania, United Republic of 0.8393 current US$ per person compare
- 36 Sao Tome and Principe 0.8374 current US$ per person compare
- 37 Chad 0.8347 current US$ per person compare
More aid effectiveness data for Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 413,634 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 113.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 60.36 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 248.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 37.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 144.59 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 87.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 49.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 9.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 50.61 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the was 0.8642 current US$ per person in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- The highest recorded value was 3.37 current US$ per person in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0053 current US$ per person in 1968.
- How does Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 34th out of 142 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Over the last ten years it is down 21.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Congo, Democratic Republic of the data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.