Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Cuba
Cuba: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 13.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Cuba, 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Cuba stood at 13.8 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is down 55.7% on the previous year and up 1,329.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Cuba peaked at 141.81 current US$ per square kilometre in 1977 and was at its lowest, -1.12 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2011.
That places Cuba 69th out of 141 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Cuba, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.6518 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 4.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +542.9% |
| 1972 | 9.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +120.0% |
| 1973 | 16.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.8% |
| 1974 | 94.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +469.8% |
| 1975 | 92.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1976 | 123.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.4% |
| 1977 | 141.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 1978 | 72.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.9% |
| 1979 | 74.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1980 | 35.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.3% |
| 1981 | 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -91.9% |
| 1982 | 5.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +87.1% |
| 1983 | 14.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +165.5% |
| 1984 | 21.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.4% |
| 1985 | 16.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.0% |
| 1986 | 21.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.2% |
| 1987 | 36.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.1% |
| 1988 | 5.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.2% |
| 1989 | 32.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +469.4% |
| 1990 | 24.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.8% |
| 1991 | 25.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1992 | 10.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.6% |
| 1993 | 4.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.5% |
| 1994 | 59.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +1170.0% |
| 1995 | 33.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.6% |
| 1996 | 10.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.7% |
| 1997 | 9.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1998 | 9.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1999 | 18.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +88.6% |
| 2000 | 10.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.4% |
| 2001 | 7.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.7% |
| 2002 | 17.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +135.5% |
| 2003 | 24.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.5% |
| 2004 | 25 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2005 | 8.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.0% |
| 2006 | 8.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2007 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.0% |
| 2008 | 8.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +690.9% |
| 2009 | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.1% |
| 2010 | 0.5637 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.8% |
| 2011 | -1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -299.2% |
| 2015 | -0.0562 current US$ per square kilometre | -95.0% |
| 2016 | 3.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -7171.1% |
| 2017 | 17.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +351.2% |
| 2018 | 22.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.7% |
| 2019 | 29.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.1% |
| 2020 | 28.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2021 | 36.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.1% |
| 2022 | 31.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.2% |
| 2023 | 13.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 63.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6518 current US$ per square kilometre | 141.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 19.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 20.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 59.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 11.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 25 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 10.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 29.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 2020s | 27.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 66 Ghana 15.66 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 67 Senegal 14.55 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 68 Samoa 14.24 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 70 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 13.79 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 71 Trinidad and Tobago 13.65 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 72 Benin 13.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Cuba
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 142,165 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 582,429 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 16.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 6.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 18.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 550,653 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.00 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Cuba?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Cuba was 13.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 141.81 current US$ per square kilometre in 1977.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- How does Cuba rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- Cuba ranks 69th out of 141 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,329.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 51 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.