Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific
East Asia & Pacific: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific stood at 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 5.7% on the previous year and down 41.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific peaked at 7.07 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007 and was at its lowest, 0.0205 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places East Asia & Pacific 41st out of 46 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0205 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0459 current US$ per square kilometre | +124.0% |
| 1963 | 0.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 1964 | 0.025 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1965 | 0.034 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.1% |
| 1967 | 0.0221 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.9% |
| 1968 | 0.0504 current US$ per square kilometre | +127.8% |
| 1969 | 0.0275 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.5% |
| 1970 | 0.3095 current US$ per square kilometre | +1026.9% |
| 1971 | 0.2082 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.7% |
| 1972 | 0.205 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1973 | 0.9649 current US$ per square kilometre | +370.8% |
| 1974 | 0.8055 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.5% |
| 1975 | 2.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +166.2% |
| 1976 | 3.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.9% |
| 1977 | 4.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.0% |
| 1978 | 3.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.2% |
| 1979 | 3.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1980 | 4.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.5% |
| 1981 | 3.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.5% |
| 1982 | 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 1983 | 2.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.3% |
| 1984 | 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 1985 | 2.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.8% |
| 1986 | 3.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.2% |
| 1987 | 2.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 1988 | 4.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.1% |
| 1989 | 3.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 1990 | 5.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.2% |
| 1991 | 4 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.8% |
| 1992 | 6.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.6% |
| 1993 | 5.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 1994 | 3.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.0% |
| 1995 | 3.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1996 | 5.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.4% |
| 1997 | 4.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.3% |
| 1998 | 3.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.8% |
| 1999 | 3.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 2000 | 4.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.1% |
| 2001 | 3.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.9% |
| 2002 | 3.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 2003 | 4.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.0% |
| 2004 | 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.3% |
| 2005 | 6.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2006 | 6.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2007 | 7.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2008 | 6.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 2009 | 6.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2010 | 4.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.3% |
| 2011 | 5.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 2012 | 4.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.3% |
| 2013 | 5.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 2014 | 4.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.3% |
| 2015 | 2.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.8% |
| 2016 | 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 2017 | 3.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 2018 | 4.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2019 | 3.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.8% |
| 2020 | 3.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2021 | 4.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 2022 | 3 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.0% |
| 2023 | 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970 | +1026.9% | 0.0275 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3095 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1973 | +370.8% | 0.205 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9649 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0344 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0205 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0504 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 2.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.205 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 5.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific
- 38 Jordan 61.43 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Yemen 61.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Myanmar 59.83 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Iraq 58.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Turkey 54.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Zambia 53.35 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 Togo 45.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 34.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 13.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 230.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 613.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 130.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 604.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 550.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 5.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.61 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific was 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The highest recorded value was 7.07 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0205 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does East Asia & Pacific rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 41st out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific?
- Over the last ten years it is down 41.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.