Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 44.34 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) stood at 44.34 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 24.0% on the previous year and up 7.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) peaked at 64.73 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.9811 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1970.
That places Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) 11th out of 46 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.9811 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.7% |
| 1972 | 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.9% |
| 1973 | 2.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.6% |
| 1974 | 3.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1975 | 6.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +106.0% |
| 1976 | 6.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1977 | 8.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.0% |
| 1978 | 8.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 1979 | 13.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.0% |
| 1980 | 13.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 1981 | 11.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 1982 | 12.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1983 | 11.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 1984 | 9.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.6% |
| 1985 | 9.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1986 | 17.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +83.3% |
| 1987 | 15.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.6% |
| 1988 | 24.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.4% |
| 1989 | 23.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 1990 | 28.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1991 | 35.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.7% |
| 1992 | 28.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.8% |
| 1993 | 21.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.3% |
| 1994 | 19.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 1995 | 18.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1996 | 21.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 1997 | 17.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.2% |
| 1998 | 15.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.8% |
| 1999 | 17.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 2000 | 20.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.9% |
| 2001 | 18.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2002 | 19.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2003 | 34.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.4% |
| 2004 | 34.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2005 | 39.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 2006 | 41.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2007 | 49.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 2008 | 50.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2009 | 43.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.6% |
| 2010 | 44.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2011 | 64.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.3% |
| 2012 | 41.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.2% |
| 2013 | 46.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 2014 | 42.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 2015 | 37.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 2016 | 36.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2017 | 44.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.8% |
| 2018 | 52.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.2% |
| 2019 | 47.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 2020 | 46.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2021 | 58.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.1% |
| 2022 | 44.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 5.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9811 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 14.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 22.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 35.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 35.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 50.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 45.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 64.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 49.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 44.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 58.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- 8 Bosnia and Herzegovina 361.1 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 North Macedonia 358.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 Liberia 345.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Georgia 315.58 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Haiti 312.34 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Bangladesh 296.72 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Syrian Arab Republic 288.19 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 61.63 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 413.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.20 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.27 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 534.00 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.57 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.55 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.14 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 362.50 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.27 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) was 44.34 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The highest recorded value was 64.73 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.9811 current US$ per square kilometre in 1970.
- How does Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 11th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.