Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Russian Federation
Russian Federation: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 4.25 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Russian Federation, 1992–2004
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Russian Federation recorded 4.25 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in 2004. That is the highest value across all 13 years on record.
That represents a change of up 73.0% on the previous year and up 1,060.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Russian Federation peaked at 4.25 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004 and was at its lowest, 0.1593 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1993.
Russian Federation ranks 99th of 141 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in Russian Federation, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0.3905 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0.1593 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.2% |
| 1994 | 0.3663 current US$ per square kilometre | +130.0% |
| 1995 | 0.7443 current US$ per square kilometre | +103.2% |
| 1996 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.6% |
| 1997 | 0.8725 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.7% |
| 1998 | 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.6% |
| 1999 | 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 2000 | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.9% |
| 2001 | 1.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2002 | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 2003 | 2.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.2% |
| 2004 | 4.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.7672 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1593 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 2.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
Countries ranked near Russian Federation
- 96 Lesotho 4.49 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 97 Romania 4.48 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 98 Poland 4.34 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 100 Ecuador 3.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 101 Madagascar 3.48 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 102 Guinea 3.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Russian Federation
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 22.99 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 90,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 13.20 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 160.07 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 12.15 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 98.31 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 31.89 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 37.91 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.02 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.82 million current US$ (2004)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Russian Federation?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in Russian Federation was 4.25 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Russian Federation?
- The highest recorded value was 4.25 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in Russian Federation?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1593 current US$ per square kilometre in 1993.
- How does Russian Federation rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- Russian Federation ranks 99th out of 141 countries with data for 2004.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in Russian Federation?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,060.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Russian Federation data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.