Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in South Asia
South Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per was 18.27 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
18.27 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 5.3%
Rank
24th
of 46 groups
All-time high
69.33 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1989
All-time low
0.0983 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
62
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in South Asia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in South Asia stood at 18.27 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is up 5.3% on the previous year and down 10.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in South Asia peaked at 69.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 1989 and was at its lowest, 0.0983 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places South Asia 24th out of 46 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per in South Asia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0983 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.1371 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.4% |
| 1963 | 0.9714 current US$ per square kilometre | +608.7% |
| 1964 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.2% |
| 1965 | 2.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +102.5% |
| 1967 | 2.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 1968 | 4.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +88.0% |
| 1969 | 5.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1970 | 2.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.7% |
| 1971 | 3.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.6% |
| 1972 | 11.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +220.0% |
| 1973 | 7.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.2% |
| 1974 | 20.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +190.8% |
| 1975 | 36.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.3% |
| 1976 | 25.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.8% |
| 1977 | 26.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1978 | 27.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1979 | 44.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.8% |
| 1980 | 35.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.9% |
| 1981 | 28.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.6% |
| 1982 | 31 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1983 | 27.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 1984 | 27.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1985 | 27.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 1986 | 37.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.5% |
| 1987 | 31.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.2% |
| 1988 | 24.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 1989 | 69.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +187.7% |
| 1990 | 28.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.8% |
| 1991 | 34.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1992 | 37.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1993 | 32.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.6% |
| 1994 | 37.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1995 | 27.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.5% |
| 1996 | 28.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1997 | 22.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.2% |
| 1998 | 15.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.3% |
| 1999 | 16.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 2000 | 19.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.5% |
| 2001 | 21.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2002 | 12.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.1% |
| 2003 | 20.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.7% |
| 2004 | 18.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 2005 | 27.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.8% |
| 2006 | 25.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 2007 | 9.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.2% |
| 2008 | 21.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +121.2% |
| 2009 | 23.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2010 | 18.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.4% |
| 2011 | 19.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2012 | 19.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2013 | 20.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 2014 | 20.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2015 | 16.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.5% |
| 2016 | 12.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 2017 | 17.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.7% |
| 2018 | 18.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2019 | 18.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2020 | 19.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 2021 | 24.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.6% |
| 2022 | 17.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.8% |
| 2023 | 18.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0983 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 20.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 44.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 34.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 69.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 27.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 37.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 20.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 18.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 20.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 20 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near South Asia
- 21 Afghanistan 131.13 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 22 Guatemala 119.36 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Somalia 117.64 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Lithuania 111.52 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Estonia 108.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 El Salvador 104.91 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Mozambique 97.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for South Asia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 21.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 2.34 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 155.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 378.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 89.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 696.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 274.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 190.51 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 25.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.96 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in South Asia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per in South Asia was 18.27 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in South Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 69.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 1989.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per recorded in South Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0983 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does South Asia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per?
- South Asia ranks 24th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden (current us$), per rising or falling in South Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 10.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this South Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.