Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) in IDA blend
IDA blend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) was 129.33 million current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden in IDA blend, 1970–2022
Source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden in IDA blend is 129.33 million current US$, measured in 2022.
The figure is down 17.0% on the previous year and down 5.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden in IDA blend peaked at 165.19 million current US$ in 2007 and was at its lowest, 8.90 million current US$, in 1972.
IDA blend ranks 30th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$) in IDA blend, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 13.80 million current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 12.78 million current US$ | -7.4% |
| 1972 | 8.90 million current US$ | -30.4% |
| 1973 | 12.75 million current US$ | +43.3% |
| 1974 | 17.72 million current US$ | +39.0% |
| 1975 | 23.98 million current US$ | +35.3% |
| 1976 | 25.98 million current US$ | +8.3% |
| 1977 | 25.98 million current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 30.23 million current US$ | +16.4% |
| 1979 | 41.00 million current US$ | +35.6% |
| 1980 | 61.04 million current US$ | +48.9% |
| 1981 | 43.77 million current US$ | -28.3% |
| 1982 | 42.63 million current US$ | -2.6% |
| 1983 | 38.91 million current US$ | -8.7% |
| 1984 | 40.40 million current US$ | +3.8% |
| 1985 | 51.23 million current US$ | +26.8% |
| 1986 | 41.51 million current US$ | -19.0% |
| 1987 | 72.16 million current US$ | +73.8% |
| 1988 | 65.92 million current US$ | -8.6% |
| 1989 | 70.66 million current US$ | +7.2% |
| 1990 | 78.69 million current US$ | +11.4% |
| 1991 | 79.09 million current US$ | +0.5% |
| 1992 | 106.39 million current US$ | +34.5% |
| 1993 | 70.70 million current US$ | -33.5% |
| 1994 | 64.84 million current US$ | -8.3% |
| 1995 | 72.36 million current US$ | +11.6% |
| 1996 | 73.00 million current US$ | +0.9% |
| 1997 | 46.16 million current US$ | -36.8% |
| 1998 | 57.74 million current US$ | +25.1% |
| 1999 | 35.01 million current US$ | -39.4% |
| 2000 | 38.60 million current US$ | +10.3% |
| 2001 | 27.78 million current US$ | -28.0% |
| 2002 | 32.09 million current US$ | +15.5% |
| 2003 | 52.60 million current US$ | +63.9% |
| 2004 | 70.37 million current US$ | +33.8% |
| 2005 | 81.84 million current US$ | +16.3% |
| 2006 | 101.77 million current US$ | +24.4% |
| 2007 | 165.19 million current US$ | +62.3% |
| 2008 | 110.36 million current US$ | -33.2% |
| 2009 | 117.90 million current US$ | +6.8% |
| 2010 | 128.28 million current US$ | +8.8% |
| 2011 | 144.68 million current US$ | +12.8% |
| 2012 | 136.96 million current US$ | -5.3% |
| 2013 | 135.28 million current US$ | -1.2% |
| 2014 | 133.92 million current US$ | -1.0% |
| 2015 | 113.01 million current US$ | -15.6% |
| 2016 | 118.73 million current US$ | +5.1% |
| 2017 | 139.80 million current US$ | +17.7% |
| 2018 | 138.66 million current US$ | -0.8% |
| 2019 | 131.06 million current US$ | -5.5% |
| 2020 | 137.17 million current US$ | +4.7% |
| 2021 | 155.78 million current US$ | +13.6% |
| 2022 | 129.33 million current US$ | -17.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 21.31 million current US$ | 8.90 million current US$ | 41.00 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 52.82 million current US$ | 38.91 million current US$ | 72.16 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 68.40 million current US$ | 35.01 million current US$ | 106.39 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 79.85 million current US$ | 27.78 million current US$ | 165.19 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 132.04 million current US$ | 113.01 million current US$ | 144.68 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 140.76 million current US$ | 129.33 million current US$ | 155.78 million current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near IDA blend
- 27 Rwanda 28.71 million current US$ compare
- 28 Iraq 25.37 million current US$ compare
- 29 Georgia 21.93 million current US$ compare
- 30 Bosnia and Herzegovina 18.49 million current US$ compare
- 31 Cambodia 16.19 million current US$ compare
- 32 Chad 16.13 million current US$ compare
- 33 Lebanon 15.15 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for IDA blend
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 13.45 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.88 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 202.73 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 612.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 62.05 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 438.92 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 753.26 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 317.55 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 59.79 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 324.78 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden in IDA blend?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden in IDA blend was 129.33 million current US$ in 2022, according to Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden recorded in IDA blend?
- The highest recorded value was 165.19 million current US$ in 2007.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden recorded in IDA blend?
- The lowest recorded value was 8.90 million current US$ in 1972.
- How does IDA blend rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden?
- IDA blend ranks 30th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, sweden rising or falling in IDA blend?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this IDA blend data come from?
- The figures come from Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.