Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Latin America & Caribbean
Latin America & Caribbean: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) was 8.22 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
8.22 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 8.9%
Rank
34th
of 44 groups
All-time high
10.91 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2014
All-time low
-0.0159 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1967
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Latin America & Caribbean, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Latin America & Caribbean is 8.22 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 8.9% on the previous year and down 14.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Latin America & Caribbean peaked at 10.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 2014 and was at its lowest, -0.0159 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1967.
That places Latin America & Caribbean 34th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Latin America & Caribbean, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0005 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0628 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0.0936 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.2% |
| 1965 | 0.0882 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 1966 | 0.0936 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1967 | -0.0159 current US$ per square kilometre | -117.0% |
| 1968 | -0.0149 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1969 | 0.0648 current US$ per square kilometre | -533.3% |
| 1970 | 0.1669 current US$ per square kilometre | +157.7% |
| 1971 | 0.0936 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.9% |
| 1972 | 0.2197 current US$ per square kilometre | +134.6% |
| 1973 | 0.1878 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.5% |
| 1974 | 0.2969 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.1% |
| 1975 | 0.2082 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.9% |
| 1976 | 0.2406 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 1977 | 0.4433 current US$ per square kilometre | +84.3% |
| 1978 | 0.4941 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 1979 | 0.7133 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.4% |
| 1980 | 0.8812 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.5% |
| 1981 | 0.7044 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.1% |
| 1982 | 0.8408 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 1983 | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.3% |
| 1984 | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 1985 | 1.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 1986 | 2.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.7% |
| 1987 | 2.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.2% |
| 1988 | 2.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1989 | 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1990 | 3.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.0% |
| 1991 | 4.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.2% |
| 1992 | 4 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 1993 | 2.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.0% |
| 1994 | 4.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.9% |
| 1995 | 4.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1996 | 4.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1997 | 3.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.3% |
| 1998 | 3.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 1999 | 3.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2000 | 3.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.7% |
| 2001 | 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2002 | 3.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.7% |
| 2003 | 4.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.5% |
| 2004 | 5.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 2005 | 5.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2006 | 4.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 2007 | 5.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 2008 | 5.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 2009 | 6 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 2010 | 7.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.7% |
| 2011 | 7.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2012 | 8.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2013 | 9.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2014 | 10.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 2015 | 10.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 2016 | 10.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 2017 | 9.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 2018 | 9.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2019 | 10.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 2020 | 10.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2021 | 10.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2022 | 9.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 2023 | 8.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0414 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0159 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0936 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.3064 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0936 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7133 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7044 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 9.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 9.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean
- 31 Gambia 96.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Honduras 92.89 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Lao People's Democratic Republic 74.08 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Myanmar 69.3 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Somalia 64.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Nicaragua 63.99 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Cuba 59.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Latin America & Caribbean
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 23.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 364.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 739.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 164.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 670.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 874.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 195.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 86.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 665.35 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Latin America & Caribbean?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Latin America & Caribbean was 8.22 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
- The highest recorded value was 10.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 2014.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0159 current US$ per square kilometre in 1967.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
- Latin America & Caribbean ranks 34th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean?
- Over the last ten years it is down 14.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.