Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Low income
Low income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) was 32.93 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Low income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Low income is 32.93 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 16.2% on the previous year and up 48.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Low income peaked at 32.93 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
Low income ranks 8th of 44 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Low income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0046 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0311 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0.0603 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.1% |
| 1965 | 0.0841 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.4% |
| 1966 | 0.1197 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.4% |
| 1967 | 0.1106 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 1968 | 0.1115 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1969 | 0.1819 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.1% |
| 1970 | 0.1435 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.1% |
| 1971 | 0.1974 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.6% |
| 1972 | 0.3226 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.4% |
| 1973 | 0.4222 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.9% |
| 1974 | 0.5703 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.1% |
| 1975 | 0.6462 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 1976 | 0.6819 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1977 | 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.4% |
| 1978 | 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +117.9% |
| 1979 | 2.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.1% |
| 1980 | 2.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1981 | 2.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 1982 | 3.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.5% |
| 1983 | 4.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 1984 | 4.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 1985 | 4.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1986 | 6.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.2% |
| 1987 | 7.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.2% |
| 1988 | 9.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.5% |
| 1989 | 7.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.2% |
| 1990 | 12.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.0% |
| 1991 | 12.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1992 | 11.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1993 | 9.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.4% |
| 1994 | 10.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1995 | 11.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 1996 | 10.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 1997 | 7.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.2% |
| 1998 | 7.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1999 | 7.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2000 | 8.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2001 | 7.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2002 | 9.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 2003 | 13.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.7% |
| 2004 | 13.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 2005 | 12.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2006 | 12.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2007 | 15.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.4% |
| 2008 | 14.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 2009 | 28.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +93.1% |
| 2010 | 18.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.7% |
| 2011 | 28.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.4% |
| 2012 | 19.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.8% |
| 2013 | 22.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 2014 | 25.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 2015 | 27.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2016 | 24.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 2017 | 23.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2018 | 24.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2019 | 26.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2020 | 27.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 2021 | 30.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 2022 | 28.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 2023 | 32.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0782 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1819 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.8494 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1435 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 5.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 10.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 13.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 28.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 24.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 28.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 29.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low income
- 5 Moldova 1,216 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Albania 1,069 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Maldives 900 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Haiti 770.12 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 North Macedonia 751.53 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 Marshall Islands 564.77 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Bosnia and Herzegovina 429.81 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 57.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 350.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 677.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.08 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 483.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.77 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 807.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 919.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 202.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 905.72 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Low income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Low income was 32.93 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in Low income?
- The highest recorded value was 32.93 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in Low income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Low income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
- Low income ranks 8th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) rising or falling in Low income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 48.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.