Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Ecuador
Ecuador: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Ecuador, 1968–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 26.0% on the previous year and down 53.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Ecuador peaked at 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1992 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, in 1968.
Ecuador ranks 108th of 151 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | current US$ per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1968 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1969 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +563.8% |
| 1970 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +824.1% |
| 1971 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -57.2% |
| 1972 | 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +147.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -57.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +39.0% |
| 1975 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -75.0% |
| 1976 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -47.2% |
| 1977 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +14.5% |
| 1978 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +181.1% |
| 1979 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -39.1% |
| 1980 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 1981 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -25.9% |
| 1982 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +185.3% |
| 1983 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -6.1% |
| 1984 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -25.2% |
| 1985 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +72.3% |
| 1986 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +8.3% |
| 1987 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +136.1% |
| 1988 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -9.4% |
| 1989 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +7.3% |
| 1990 | 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +15.3% |
| 1991 | 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +20.5% |
| 1992 | 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +45.5% |
| 1993 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -45.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +2.8% |
| 1995 | 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +23.2% |
| 1996 | 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 1997 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -27.9% |
| 1998 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +6.8% |
| 1999 | 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +14.6% |
| 2000 | 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +1.5% |
| 2001 | 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +12.8% |
| 2002 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -22.0% |
| 2003 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +5.2% |
| 2004 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -10.3% |
| 2005 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -1.4% |
| 2006 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 2007 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -17.3% |
| 2008 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -14.9% |
| 2009 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -26.3% |
| 2010 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -57.8% |
| 2011 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -20.5% |
| 2012 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -3.3% |
| 2013 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -27.4% |
| 2014 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +12.2% |
| 2015 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -17.6% |
| 2016 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +91.9% |
| 2017 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -45.7% |
| 2018 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -8.4% |
| 2019 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +13.9% |
| 2020 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -60.5% |
| 2021 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -1.6% |
| 2022 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 2023 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +26.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 2 |
| 1970s | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More aid effectiveness data for Ecuador
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 909,618 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 4.52 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 10.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.97 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 30.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 28.17 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 596,171 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 180.24 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Ecuador?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) in Ecuador was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1992.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1968.
- How does Ecuador rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$)?
- Ecuador ranks 108th out of 151 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, switzerland (current us$) rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 53.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 56 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.