Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Brazil
Brazil: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 76.65 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
76.65 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 19.4%
World rank
156th
of 178 countries
All-time high
151.72 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2012
All-time low
-31.58 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1992
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Brazil, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Brazil is 76.65 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 19.4% on the previous year and down 44.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Brazil peaked at 151.72 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012 and was at its lowest, -31.58 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1992.
That places Brazil 156th out of 178 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Brazil, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 34.81 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 21.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.6% |
| 1963 | 23.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1964 | 28.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.3% |
| 1965 | 27.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 1966 | 38.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.9% |
| 1967 | 21.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.1% |
| 1968 | 25.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 1969 | 15.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.5% |
| 1970 | 15.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1971 | 13.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 1972 | 10.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.0% |
| 1973 | 6.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.5% |
| 1974 | 14.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +109.3% |
| 1975 | 13.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 1976 | 9.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.7% |
| 1977 | 6.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.1% |
| 1978 | 9.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.4% |
| 1979 | 6.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.9% |
| 1980 | 6.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1981 | 24.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +254.9% |
| 1982 | 19.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.6% |
| 1983 | 11.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.9% |
| 1984 | 16.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.0% |
| 1985 | 7.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.6% |
| 1986 | 16.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +105.8% |
| 1987 | 30.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.9% |
| 1988 | 23.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.8% |
| 1989 | 23.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 1990 | 17.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.2% |
| 1991 | 20.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 1992 | -31.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -252.5% |
| 1993 | 19.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -162.6% |
| 1994 | 27.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.1% |
| 1995 | 27.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1996 | 26.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1997 | 25.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 1998 | 28.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1999 | 15.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.7% |
| 2000 | 28.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +86.3% |
| 2001 | 27.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 2002 | 25.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 2003 | 24.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 2004 | 18.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.8% |
| 2005 | 22.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.0% |
| 2006 | 10.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.3% |
| 2007 | 35.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +253.4% |
| 2008 | 51.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.5% |
| 2009 | 39.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 2010 | 50.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.2% |
| 2011 | 95.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +89.9% |
| 2012 | 151.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.7% |
| 2013 | 138.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 2014 | 105.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.1% |
| 2015 | 116.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 2016 | 76.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.8% |
| 2017 | 28.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.1% |
| 2018 | 48.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.3% |
| 2019 | 29.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.3% |
| 2020 | 56.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.3% |
| 2021 | 128.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +126.3% |
| 2022 | 64.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 2023 | 76.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 26.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 38.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 10.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 18.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 30.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 17.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 28.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 28.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 51.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 84.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 28.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 151.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 81.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 56.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 128.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 153 Guyana 122.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 154 Aruba 111.11 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 155 Algeria 82.1 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 157 Russian Federation 76.09 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 158 Thailand 73.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 159 Singapore 72.57 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Brazil
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 938,500 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 122.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 8.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 100.85 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 31.27 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 14.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 154.53 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Brazil?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Brazil was 76.65 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 151.72 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was -31.58 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992.
- How does Brazil rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Brazil ranks 156th out of 178 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is down 44.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.