Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in European Union
European Union: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 0.0702 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in European Union, 1970–2011
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2011, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in European Union stood at 0.0702 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the lowest value across all 42 years on record.
The figure is down 99.8% on the previous year and down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in European Union peaked at 1,163 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0.0702 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2011.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in European Union, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 6.18 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 3.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.6% |
| 1972 | 5.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.1% |
| 1973 | 8.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.8% |
| 1974 | 6.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 1975 | 10.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.7% |
| 1976 | 13.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.9% |
| 1977 | 19.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.2% |
| 1978 | 15.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.2% |
| 1979 | 8.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.4% |
| 1980 | 11.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.4% |
| 1981 | 20.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.3% |
| 1982 | 9.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.7% |
| 1983 | 11.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 1984 | 3.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.9% |
| 1985 | 8.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +141.1% |
| 1986 | 8.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1987 | 8.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1988 | 5.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.7% |
| 1989 | 5.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 1990 | 461.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +7599.3% |
| 1991 | 1,157 current US$ per square kilometre | +150.9% |
| 1992 | 664.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.6% |
| 1993 | 469.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.4% |
| 1994 | 716.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.7% |
| 1995 | 1,163 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.3% |
| 1996 | 631.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.7% |
| 1997 | 522.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.2% |
| 1998 | 686.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.2% |
| 1999 | 794.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 2000 | 838.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 2001 | 849.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2002 | 633.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.4% |
| 2003 | 895.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.3% |
| 2004 | 1,150 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.4% |
| 2005 | 28.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.5% |
| 2006 | 47.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.0% |
| 2007 | 39.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.7% |
| 2008 | 59.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.1% |
| 2009 | 41.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.7% |
| 2010 | 36.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 2011 | 0.0702 current US$ per square kilometre | -99.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 9.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 9.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 20.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 726.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 461.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,163 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 458.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 28.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,150 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 18.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0702 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near European Union
- 1 Naoero 1.75 million current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 2 Tuvalu 1.18 million current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 3 Marshall Islands 574,467 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 Palestine, State of 274,548 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Micronesia, Federated States of 164,397 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Tonga 151,054 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for European Union
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.74 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 110,000 current US$ (2009)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 105.39 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 70,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.53 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.77 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.05 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 280,000 current US$ (2011)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.88 million current US$ (2010)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in European Union?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in European Union was 0.0702 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in European Union?
- The highest recorded value was 1,163 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in European Union?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0702 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- How does European Union rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- European Union ranks 3rd out of 3 regions with data for 2011.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in European Union?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this European Union data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 42 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.