Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Gibraltar
Gibraltar: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre in 2002. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Gibraltar, 1961–2002
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Gibraltar is 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2002.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 66.7% on the previous year and down 99.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Gibraltar peaked at 2.89 million current US$ per square kilometre in 1985 and was at its lowest, -24,000 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1996.
That places Gibraltar 114th out of 178 countries with data for 2002, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Gibraltar, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 87,000 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 43,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.6% |
| 1963 | -1,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -102.3% |
| 1964 | 15,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -1600.0% |
| 1965 | 106,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +606.7% |
| 1966 | 170,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.4% |
| 1967 | 263,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.7% |
| 1968 | 81,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.2% |
| 1969 | 138,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.4% |
| 1970 | 265,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.0% |
| 1971 | 382,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.2% |
| 1972 | 419,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1973 | 625,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.2% |
| 1974 | 662,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1975 | 303,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.2% |
| 1976 | 295,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1977 | 445,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.8% |
| 1978 | 353,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.7% |
| 1979 | 653,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +85.0% |
| 1980 | 1.11 million current US$ per square kilometre | +70.8% |
| 1981 | 742,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.5% |
| 1982 | 312,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.0% |
| 1983 | 339,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1984 | 1.10 million current US$ per square kilometre | +223.3% |
| 1985 | 2.89 million current US$ per square kilometre | +163.9% |
| 1986 | 2.08 million current US$ per square kilometre | -28.0% |
| 1987 | 1.46 million current US$ per square kilometre | -30.1% |
| 1988 | 1.62 million current US$ per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 1989 | 45,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.2% |
| 1990 | 56,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.4% |
| 1991 | 257,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +358.9% |
| 1992 | 314,000 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 1993 | -1,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.3% |
| 1994 | 57,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -5800.0% |
| 1995 | 21,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.2% |
| 1996 | -24,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -214.3% |
| 1997 | 37,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -254.2% |
| 1998 | 22,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.5% |
| 1999 | 3,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -86.4% |
| 2002 | 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 100,222 current US$ per square kilometre | -1,000 current US$ per square kilometre | 263,000 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 440,200 current US$ per square kilometre | 265,000 current US$ per square kilometre | 662,000 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.17 million current US$ per square kilometre | 45,000 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.89 million current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 74,200 current US$ per square kilometre | -24,000 current US$ per square kilometre | 314,000 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
Countries ranked near Gibraltar
- 111 Uzbekistan 1,141 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 112 Guinea 1,134 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 113 Kyrgyzstan 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 115 South Africa 990.42 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 116 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 975.95 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 117 Madagascar 975.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Gibraltar
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 30,000 current US$ (1997)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 10,000 current US$ (1998)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 30,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total 10,000 current US$ (2002)
- Net official development assistance and official aid received 30,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net official development assistance and official aid received 230,000 constant 2023 US$ (2004)
- Net official development assistance received 30,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net official development assistance received 40,816 constant 2023 US$ (1999)
- Net ODA received per capita 1.08 current US$ (1999)
- Net official development assistance received (constant 2023 US$), per 1.47 constant 2023 US$ per person (1999)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Gibraltar?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Gibraltar was 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre in 2002, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Gibraltar?
- The highest recorded value was 2.89 million current US$ per square kilometre in 1985.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Gibraltar?
- The lowest recorded value was -24,000 current US$ per square kilometre in 1996.
- How does Gibraltar rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Gibraltar ranks 114th out of 178 countries with data for 2002.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in Gibraltar?
- Over the last ten years it is down 99.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Gibraltar data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 40 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.