Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 975.95 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
975.95 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 43.8%
World rank
116th
of 178 countries
All-time high
2,245 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2003
All-time low
26.71 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Congo, Democratic Republic of the recorded 975.95 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is up 43.8% on the previous year and up 45.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the peaked at 2,245 current US$ per square kilometre in 2003 and was at its lowest, 26.71 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 116th of 178 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 26.71 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 50.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.3% |
| 1963 | 46.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1964 | 48.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1965 | 61.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.2% |
| 1966 | 39.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.5% |
| 1967 | 40.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1968 | 31.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.2% |
| 1969 | 33.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1970 | 37.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1971 | 43.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 1972 | 48.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1973 | 55.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 1974 | 72.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.7% |
| 1975 | 76.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1976 | 74.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1977 | 89.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 1978 | 98.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 1979 | 135.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.1% |
| 1980 | 149.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 1981 | 141.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1982 | 118.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 1983 | 107.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 1984 | 107.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1985 | 101.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 1986 | 140.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.7% |
| 1987 | 158.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1988 | 193.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.3% |
| 1989 | 215.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 1990 | 301.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.3% |
| 1991 | 158.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.6% |
| 1992 | 80.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.3% |
| 1993 | 45.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.6% |
| 1994 | 46.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1995 | 61.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.2% |
| 1996 | 59.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 1997 | 50.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 1998 | 40.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.9% |
| 1999 | 41.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2000 | 60.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.2% |
| 2001 | 82.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.1% |
| 2002 | 186.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +126.5% |
| 2003 | 2,245 current US$ per square kilometre | +1103.1% |
| 2004 | 624.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -72.2% |
| 2005 | 531.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 2006 | 760.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.1% |
| 2007 | 418.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.0% |
| 2008 | 534.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.7% |
| 2009 | 587.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 2010 | 1,212 current US$ per square kilometre | +106.2% |
| 2011 | 2,009 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.7% |
| 2012 | 855.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.4% |
| 2013 | 672.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 2014 | 608.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 2015 | 708.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.4% |
| 2016 | 521.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.4% |
| 2017 | 601.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 2018 | 693.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 2019 | 758.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 2020 | 782.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 2021 | 853.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2022 | 678.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.5% |
| 2023 | 975.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 42.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 26.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 61.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 73.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 37.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 135.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 143.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 101.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 215.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 88.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 40.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 301.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 602.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 60.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,245 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 864.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 521.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,009 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 822.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 678.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 975.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- 113 Kyrgyzstan 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 114 Gibraltar 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 115 South Africa 990.42 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 117 Madagascar 975.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 118 Zambia 966.54 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 119 Azerbaijan 924.02 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 413,634 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 113.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 60.36 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 248.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 37.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 144.59 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 87.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 49.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 9.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 50.61 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Congo, Democratic Republic of the was 975.95 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- The highest recorded value was 2,245 current US$ per square kilometre in 2003.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- The lowest recorded value was 26.71 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 116th out of 178 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Over the last ten years it is up 45.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Congo, Democratic Republic of the data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.