Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean
Latin America & Caribbean: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 379.54 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
379.54 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 5.9%
Rank
37th
of 44 groups
All-time high
446.74 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2016
All-time low
30.21 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1971
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean stood at 379.54 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 5.9% on the previous year and up 13.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean peaked at 446.74 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, 30.21 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1971.
That places Latin America & Caribbean 37th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Latin America & Caribbean, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 39.78 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 38.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1963 | 39.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1964 | 32.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.3% |
| 1965 | 41.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.5% |
| 1966 | 43.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1967 | 35.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.0% |
| 1968 | 39.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1969 | 33.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 1970 | 34.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1971 | 30.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 1972 | 30.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1973 | 30.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1974 | 33.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 1975 | 39.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.5% |
| 1976 | 39.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1977 | 37.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 1978 | 48.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.5% |
| 1979 | 58.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 1980 | 66.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1981 | 80.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.1% |
| 1982 | 92.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1983 | 100.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 1984 | 109.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1985 | 129.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 1986 | 142.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1987 | 170.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.7% |
| 1988 | 170.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1989 | 191.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 1990 | 207.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1991 | 244.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.7% |
| 1992 | 220.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1993 | 219.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1994 | 231.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1995 | 258.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1996 | 239.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 1997 | 198 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.2% |
| 1998 | 196.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1999 | 202.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2000 | 192.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 2001 | 232.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.0% |
| 2002 | 199.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 2003 | 240.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 2004 | 270.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 2005 | 256.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 2006 | 283.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2007 | 273.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2008 | 349.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.8% |
| 2009 | 344.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2010 | 395.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 2011 | 419.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2012 | 375.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 2013 | 333.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 2014 | 337.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2015 | 329.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2016 | 446.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.7% |
| 2017 | 293.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.2% |
| 2018 | 385.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.4% |
| 2019 | 311.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.4% |
| 2020 | 414.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 2021 | 418.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2022 | 403.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 2023 | 379.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 38.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 43.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 38.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 30.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 58.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 125.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 66.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 191.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 221.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 196.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 258.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 264.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 192.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 349.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 362.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 293.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 446.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 403.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 379.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 418.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean
- 34 Gambia 12,842 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 12,277 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Burundi 11,738 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Vanuatu 9,716 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Serbia 9,326 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Bermuda 9,074 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Malawi 9,053 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Latin America & Caribbean
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 23.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 364.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 739.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 164.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 670.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 874.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 195.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 86.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 665.35 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Latin America & Caribbean was 379.54 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
- The highest recorded value was 446.74 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Latin America & Caribbean?
- The lowest recorded value was 30.21 current US$ per square kilometre in 1971.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Latin America & Caribbean ranks 37th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean?
- Over the last ten years it is up 13.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.