Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Cuba
Cuba: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per was 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2020. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Cuba, 1970–2020
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Cuba recorded 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in 2020.
That represents a change of up 12.3% on the previous year and down 34.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Cuba peaked at 0.0251 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, in 1970.
That places Cuba 139th out of 174 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per in Cuba, year by year
| Year | current US$ per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1971 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +311.7% |
| 1972 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +138.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +62.4% |
| 1974 | 0.001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +230.6% |
| 1975 | 0.0011 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +7.7% |
| 1976 | 0.0019 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +72.3% |
| 1977 | 0.0023 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +21.7% |
| 1978 | 0.0015 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -35.2% |
| 1979 | 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -17.9% |
| 1980 | 0.0006 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -54.5% |
| 1981 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -76.5% |
| 1982 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -44.8% |
| 1983 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +19.4% |
| 1984 | 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +211.4% |
| 1985 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -59.8% |
| 1986 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +42.5% |
| 1987 | 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +158.8% |
| 1988 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -65.1% |
| 1989 | 0.0016 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +1042.8% |
| 1990 | 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -25.7% |
| 1991 | 0.0008 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -32.9% |
| 1992 | 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -31.1% |
| 1993 | 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +125.4% |
| 1994 | 0.0013 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +4.4% |
| 1995 | 0.0016 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +27.3% |
| 1996 | 0.002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +19.8% |
| 1997 | 0.0021 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +5.5% |
| 1998 | 0.0028 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +35.9% |
| 1999 | 0.0017 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -37.8% |
| 2000 | 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -29.2% |
| 2001 | 0.0014 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +17.0% |
| 2002 | 0.0016 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +14.1% |
| 2003 | 0.0017 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +6.0% |
| 2004 | 0.002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +11.8% |
| 2005 | 0.0016 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -15.7% |
| 2006 | 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -25.6% |
| 2007 | 0.0011 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 2008 | 0.0017 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +54.8% |
| 2009 | 0.0018 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +7.1% |
| 2010 | 0.0019 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +4.9% |
| 2011 | 0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -50.3% |
| 2012 | 0.0008 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 2013 | 0.001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +15.8% |
| 2014 | 0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -1.7% |
| 2015 | 0.0021 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +122.3% |
| 2016 | 0.0251 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +1102.3% |
| 2017 | 0.0033 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -86.7% |
| 2018 | 0.0028 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -16.0% |
| 2019 | 0.0011 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -60.4% |
| 2020 | 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +12.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0023 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0016 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0015 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0028 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0015 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0011 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.004 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0008 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0251 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 1 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 136 Costa Rica 0.0015 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 137 Angola 0.0015 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 138 Belarus 0.0013 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 140 Pakistan 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 141 India 0.0011 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 142 Türkiye 0.0011 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
More aid effectiveness data for Cuba
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 142,165 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 582,429 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 16.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 6.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 18.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 550,653 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.00 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Cuba?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per in Cuba was 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2020, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0251 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2016.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1970.
- How does Cuba rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per?
- Cuba ranks 139th out of 174 countries with data for 2020.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, total (current us$), per rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 34.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 51 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.