Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Bolivia, Plurinational State of
Bolivia, Plurinational State of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 21,193 current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, 1962–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Bolivia, Plurinational State of recorded 21,193 current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in 2023.
The figure is down 97.9% on the previous year and down 97.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Bolivia, Plurinational State of peaked at 50.95 million current US$ in 1995 and was at its lowest, -105.19 million current US$, in 2007.
That places Bolivia, Plurinational State of 154th out of 169 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 170,000 current US$ | — |
| 1963 | 550,000 current US$ | +223.5% |
| 1964 | 230,000 current US$ | -58.2% |
| 1965 | 200,000 current US$ | -13.0% |
| 1966 | 180,000 current US$ | -10.0% |
| 1967 | 150,000 current US$ | -16.7% |
| 1968 | 130,000 current US$ | -13.3% |
| 1969 | 1.40 million current US$ | +976.9% |
| 1970 | 180,000 current US$ | -87.1% |
| 1971 | 320,000 current US$ | +77.8% |
| 1972 | 70,000 current US$ | -78.1% |
| 1973 | 200,000 current US$ | +185.7% |
| 1974 | 820,000 current US$ | +310.0% |
| 1975 | 830,000 current US$ | +1.2% |
| 1976 | 1.11 million current US$ | +33.7% |
| 1977 | 2.55 million current US$ | +129.7% |
| 1978 | 2.03 million current US$ | -20.4% |
| 1979 | 1.85 million current US$ | -8.9% |
| 1980 | 2.65 million current US$ | +43.2% |
| 1981 | 2.13 million current US$ | -19.6% |
| 1982 | 1.71 million current US$ | -19.7% |
| 1983 | 1.74 million current US$ | +1.8% |
| 1984 | 1.54 million current US$ | -11.5% |
| 1985 | 1.84 million current US$ | +19.5% |
| 1986 | 2.86 million current US$ | +55.4% |
| 1987 | 2.76 million current US$ | -3.5% |
| 1988 | 5.26 million current US$ | +90.6% |
| 1989 | 6.47 million current US$ | +23.0% |
| 1990 | 7.00 million current US$ | +8.2% |
| 1991 | 7.89 million current US$ | +12.7% |
| 1992 | 13.41 million current US$ | +70.0% |
| 1993 | 8.90 million current US$ | -33.6% |
| 1994 | 7.56 million current US$ | -15.1% |
| 1995 | 50.95 million current US$ | +573.9% |
| 1996 | 9.34 million current US$ | -81.7% |
| 1997 | 8.56 million current US$ | -8.4% |
| 1998 | 9.27 million current US$ | +8.3% |
| 1999 | 47.05 million current US$ | +407.6% |
| 2000 | 12.59 million current US$ | -73.2% |
| 2001 | 45.58 million current US$ | +262.0% |
| 2002 | 14.19 million current US$ | -68.9% |
| 2003 | 13.10 million current US$ | -7.7% |
| 2004 | 50.83 million current US$ | +288.0% |
| 2005 | -24.29 million current US$ | -147.8% |
| 2006 | 8.69 million current US$ | -135.8% |
| 2007 | -105.19 million current US$ | -1310.5% |
| 2008 | 1.02 million current US$ | -101.0% |
| 2009 | 530,000 current US$ | -48.0% |
| 2010 | 80,000 current US$ | -84.9% |
| 2011 | 140,000 current US$ | +75.0% |
| 2012 | 1.02 million current US$ | +628.6% |
| 2013 | 955,626 current US$ | -6.3% |
| 2014 | 1.13 million current US$ | +18.0% |
| 2015 | 1.26 million current US$ | +11.9% |
| 2016 | 296,761 current US$ | -76.5% |
| 2017 | 598,259 current US$ | +101.6% |
| 2018 | 764,201 current US$ | +27.7% |
| 2019 | 2.01 million current US$ | +162.6% |
| 2020 | 1.93 million current US$ | -4.1% |
| 2021 | 2.07 million current US$ | +7.4% |
| 2022 | 1.01 million current US$ | -51.3% |
| 2023 | 21,193 current US$ | -97.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 376,250 current US$ | 130,000 current US$ | 1.40 million current US$ | 8 |
| 1970s | 996,000 current US$ | 70,000 current US$ | 2.55 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.90 million current US$ | 1.54 million current US$ | 6.47 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 16.99 million current US$ | 7.00 million current US$ | 50.95 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.71 million current US$ | -105.19 million current US$ | 50.83 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 825,116 current US$ | 80,000 current US$ | 2.01 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.26 million current US$ | 21,193 current US$ | 2.07 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bolivia, Plurinational State of
More aid effectiveness data for Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 593,566 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 4.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 12.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 72.56 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 11.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 33.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 229.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 21,193 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 15.56 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Bolivia, Plurinational State of was 21,193 current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- The highest recorded value was 50.95 million current US$ in 1995.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- The lowest recorded value was -105.19 million current US$ in 2007.
- How does Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 154th out of 169 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- Over the last ten years it is down 97.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bolivia, Plurinational State of data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) with 238 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) with 238 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.