Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Bolivia
Bolivia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 0.0196 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
0.0196 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 97.9%
World rank
162nd
of 168 countries
All-time high
47.03 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1995
All-time low
-97.1 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2007
Years of data
62
1962–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Bolivia, 1962–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Bolivia is 0.0196 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 97.9% on the previous year and down 97.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Bolivia peaked at 47.03 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995 and was at its lowest, -97.1 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2007.
That places Bolivia 162nd out of 168 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Bolivia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 0.1569 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.5077 current US$ per square kilometre | +223.5% |
| 1964 | 0.2123 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.2% |
| 1965 | 0.1846 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 1966 | 0.1662 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1967 | 0.1385 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1968 | 0.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 1969 | 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +976.9% |
| 1970 | 0.1662 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.1% |
| 1971 | 0.2954 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.8% |
| 1972 | 0.0646 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.1% |
| 1973 | 0.1846 current US$ per square kilometre | +185.7% |
| 1974 | 0.7569 current US$ per square kilometre | +310.0% |
| 1975 | 0.7662 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1976 | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.7% |
| 1977 | 2.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +129.7% |
| 1978 | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.4% |
| 1979 | 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1980 | 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.2% |
| 1981 | 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.6% |
| 1982 | 1.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.7% |
| 1983 | 1.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1984 | 1.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 1985 | 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 1986 | 2.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.4% |
| 1987 | 2.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1988 | 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.6% |
| 1989 | 5.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.0% |
| 1990 | 6.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1991 | 7.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1992 | 12.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.0% |
| 1993 | 8.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.6% |
| 1994 | 6.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 1995 | 47.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +573.9% |
| 1996 | 8.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.7% |
| 1997 | 7.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 1998 | 8.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1999 | 43.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +407.6% |
| 2000 | 11.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.2% |
| 2001 | 42.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +262.0% |
| 2002 | 13.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.9% |
| 2003 | 12.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 2004 | 46.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +288.0% |
| 2005 | -22.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -147.8% |
| 2006 | 8.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -135.8% |
| 2007 | -97.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -1310.5% |
| 2008 | 0.9416 current US$ per square kilometre | -101.0% |
| 2009 | 0.4892 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0738 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.9% |
| 2011 | 0.1292 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.0% |
| 2012 | 0.9416 current US$ per square kilometre | +628.6% |
| 2013 | 0.8821 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2014 | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.0% |
| 2015 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 2016 | 0.2739 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.5% |
| 2017 | 0.5523 current US$ per square kilometre | +101.6% |
| 2018 | 0.7054 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.7% |
| 2019 | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +162.6% |
| 2020 | 1.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 2021 | 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2022 | 0.9294 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.3% |
| 2023 | 0.0196 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3473 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 0.9194 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0646 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 15.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 47.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 46.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.7617 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0738 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0196 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bolivia
- 159 Iran 0.1027 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 160 Togo 0.0686 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 161 Suriname 0.0412 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 163 Mauritania 0.0072 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 164 Paraguay -0.0057 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 165 Marshall Islands -0.3889 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Bolivia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 593,566 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 4.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 12.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 72.56 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 11.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 33.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 229.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 21,193 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 15.56 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Bolivia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Bolivia was 0.0196 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Bolivia?
- The highest recorded value was 47.03 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Bolivia?
- The lowest recorded value was -97.1 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007.
- How does Bolivia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Bolivia ranks 162nd out of 168 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Bolivia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 97.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bolivia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.