Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Brazil
Brazil: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 9.28 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
9.28 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 332.2%
World rank
88th
of 168 countries
All-time high
9.28 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
-0.3314 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1968
Years of data
62
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Brazil, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Brazil recorded 9.28 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in 2023. That is the highest value across all 62 years on record.
That represents a change of up 332.2% on the previous year and up 811.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Brazil peaked at 9.28 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, -0.3314 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1968.
That places Brazil 88th out of 168 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Brazil, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.201 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.6365 current US$ per square kilometre | +216.7% |
| 1964 | 0.2812 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.8% |
| 1965 | 0.2345 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.6% |
| 1966 | 0.1029 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.1% |
| 1967 | -0.3027 current US$ per square kilometre | -394.2% |
| 1968 | -0.3314 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1969 | -0.1376 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.5% |
| 1970 | -0.1328 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1971 | -0.0909 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.5% |
| 1972 | 0.0251 current US$ per square kilometre | -127.6% |
| 1973 | 0.1472 current US$ per square kilometre | +485.7% |
| 1974 | 0.5181 current US$ per square kilometre | +252.0% |
| 1975 | 0.8901 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.8% |
| 1976 | 0.4893 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.0% |
| 1977 | 0.2536 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.2% |
| 1978 | 0.0562 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.8% |
| 1979 | 0.1388 current US$ per square kilometre | +146.8% |
| 1980 | 0.146 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1981 | 0.0371 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.6% |
| 1982 | 1.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +5254.8% |
| 1983 | 0.9691 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.2% |
| 1984 | 0.9763 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1985 | 0.6221 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.3% |
| 1986 | 0.1543 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.2% |
| 1987 | 0.1508 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1988 | 0.3075 current US$ per square kilometre | +104.0% |
| 1989 | 0.274 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.9% |
| 1990 | 0.3027 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 1991 | 0.7753 current US$ per square kilometre | +156.1% |
| 1992 | 0.8076 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1993 | 0.9524 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 1994 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1995 | 0.8782 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.7% |
| 1996 | 0.7502 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.6% |
| 1997 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.2% |
| 1998 | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.4% |
| 1999 | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2000 | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.5% |
| 2001 | 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.8% |
| 2002 | 1.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.2% |
| 2003 | 1.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.8% |
| 2004 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.1% |
| 2005 | 0.7825 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.8% |
| 2006 | 0.189 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.8% |
| 2007 | 0.3649 current US$ per square kilometre | +93.0% |
| 2008 | 1.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +342.6% |
| 2009 | 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 2010 | 4.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +211.6% |
| 2011 | 5.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.2% |
| 2012 | 8.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.4% |
| 2013 | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.5% |
| 2014 | 2 current US$ per square kilometre | +96.7% |
| 2015 | 3.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.6% |
| 2016 | 8.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +127.0% |
| 2017 | 3.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.4% |
| 2018 | 3.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 2019 | 5.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.9% |
| 2020 | 5.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2021 | 4.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 2022 | 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.8% |
| 2023 | 9.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +332.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0855 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.3314 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6365 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 1970s | 0.2295 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.1328 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8901 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.5623 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0371 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.9353 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3027 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.189 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 5.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 85 Dominican Republic 10.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 86 Eswatini 9.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 87 Mali 9.45 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 89 Cape Verde 9.25 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 90 Kyrgyzstan 9.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 91 Eritrea 8.97 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Brazil
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 938,500 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 122.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 8.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 100.85 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 31.27 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 14.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 154.53 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Brazil?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Brazil was 9.28 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 9.28 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.3314 current US$ per square kilometre in 1968.
- How does Brazil rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Brazil ranks 88th out of 168 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 811.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.