Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 10.39 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) recorded 10.39 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in 2023.
That represents a change of down 28.3% on the previous year and down 45.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) peaked at 27.38 current US$ per square kilometre in 2018 and was at its lowest, -30.37 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2007.
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 35th of 45 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.6258 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.9353 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.4% |
| 1963 | 0.7731 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.3% |
| 1964 | 0.2499 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.7% |
| 1965 | -0.0112 current US$ per square kilometre | -104.5% |
| 1966 | 0.4392 current US$ per square kilometre | -4033.3% |
| 1967 | 0.2967 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.4% |
| 1968 | 0.5019 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.2% |
| 1969 | 0.7343 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.3% |
| 1970 | 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +167.8% |
| 1971 | 3.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +68.2% |
| 1972 | 2.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 1973 | 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1974 | 3.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 1975 | 4.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.1% |
| 1976 | 3.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.5% |
| 1977 | 2.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 1978 | 5.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.2% |
| 1979 | 4.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 1980 | 4.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 1981 | 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 1982 | 7.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +122.6% |
| 1983 | 4.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.3% |
| 1984 | 2.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.2% |
| 1985 | 3.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.3% |
| 1986 | 3.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1987 | 4.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 1988 | 5.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 1989 | 7.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.9% |
| 1990 | 6.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 1991 | 6.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1992 | 6.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 1993 | 5.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 1994 | 6.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 1995 | 8.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.1% |
| 1996 | 6.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.1% |
| 1997 | 15.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +151.5% |
| 1998 | 11.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.5% |
| 1999 | 16.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.6% |
| 2000 | 11.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.9% |
| 2001 | 9.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.7% |
| 2002 | 14.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.7% |
| 2003 | 7.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.8% |
| 2004 | 7.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2005 | 7.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2006 | 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.9% |
| 2007 | -30.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -1388.3% |
| 2008 | 8.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -127.6% |
| 2009 | 8.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2010 | 9.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 2011 | 12.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.8% |
| 2012 | 22.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.1% |
| 2013 | 19.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 2014 | 13.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 2015 | 17.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.0% |
| 2016 | 22.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.8% |
| 2017 | 26.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.9% |
| 2018 | 27.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2019 | 18.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.4% |
| 2020 | 21.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 2021 | 16.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 2022 | 14.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.8% |
| 2023 | 10.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.505 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0112 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9353 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 3.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 9.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 18.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 15.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- 32 Albania 210.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Somalia 193.28 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Ethiopia 190.99 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Barbados 186.05 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 North Macedonia 183.04 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Uganda 157.69 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Sri Lanka 154.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 23.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 364.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 739.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 164.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 670.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 874.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 195.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 86.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 665.35 million current US$ (2023)
All data for Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) was 10.39 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 27.38 current US$ per square kilometre in 2018.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was -30.37 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007.
- How does Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 35th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 45.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.