Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Low income
Low income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 62.59 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
62.59 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 23.4%
Rank
14th
of 45 groups
All-time high
184.98 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2015
All-time low
2.29 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1973
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Low income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Low income stood at 62.59 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 23.4% on the previous year and down 57.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Low income peaked at 184.98 current US$ per square kilometre in 2015 and was at its lowest, 2.29 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1973.
That places Low income 14th out of 45 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Low income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 4.79 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 4.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1963 | 5.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1964 | 7.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.5% |
| 1965 | 7.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1966 | 8.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1967 | 7.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.2% |
| 1968 | 3.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.2% |
| 1969 | 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1970 | 3.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1971 | 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 1972 | 3.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.8% |
| 1973 | 2.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.2% |
| 1974 | 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1975 | 3.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.6% |
| 1976 | 4.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.4% |
| 1977 | 4.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 1978 | 6.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.0% |
| 1979 | 10.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.7% |
| 1980 | 11.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1981 | 13.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 1982 | 12.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 1983 | 9.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 1984 | 7.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1985 | 10.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.0% |
| 1986 | 9.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 1987 | 14.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.5% |
| 1988 | 22.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.9% |
| 1989 | 20.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 1990 | 19.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 1991 | 21.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 1992 | 16.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.3% |
| 1993 | 15.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1994 | 22.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.1% |
| 1995 | 20.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1996 | 23.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.4% |
| 1997 | 21.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 1998 | 26.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.8% |
| 1999 | 25.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 2000 | 46.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +87.2% |
| 2001 | 42.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 2002 | 39.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 2003 | 46.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.5% |
| 2004 | 95.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +106.1% |
| 2005 | 78.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 2006 | 114.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.0% |
| 2007 | 106.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 2008 | 124.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 2009 | 119.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 2010 | 116.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 2011 | 162.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.5% |
| 2012 | 124.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.0% |
| 2013 | 146.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.9% |
| 2014 | 165.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 2015 | 184.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 2016 | 160.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 2017 | 169.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2018 | 158.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 2019 | 171.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2020 | 146.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 2021 | 97.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.8% |
| 2022 | 81.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.9% |
| 2023 | 62.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 4.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 13.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 21.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 26.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 81.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 39.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 124.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 156.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 116.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 184.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 97.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 62.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 146.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low income
- 11 Syria 741.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Republic of Moldova 596.6 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Mauritius 569.5 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Sierra Leone 555.24 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Bangladesh 553.65 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Ukraine 536.05 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 509.6 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 57.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 350.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 677.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.08 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 483.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.77 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 807.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 919.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 202.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 905.72 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Low income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Low income was 62.59 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Low income?
- The highest recorded value was 184.98 current US$ per square kilometre in 2015.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Low income?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.29 current US$ per square kilometre in 1973.
- How does Low income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Low income ranks 14th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Low income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 57.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.