Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Tanzania, United Republic of
Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) was 41.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
41.8 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 9.9%
World rank
56th
of 168 countries
All-time high
353.33 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2015
All-time low
1.85 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1969
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Tanzania, United Republic of, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Tanzania, United Republic of recorded 41.8 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in 2023.
The figure is down 9.9% on the previous year and down 84.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Tanzania, United Republic of peaked at 353.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2015 and was at its lowest, 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1969.
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 56th of 168 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) in Tanzania, United Republic of, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 38.09 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 42.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 1963 | 26.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.5% |
| 1964 | 27.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1965 | 20.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.1% |
| 1966 | 13.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.8% |
| 1967 | 3.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.6% |
| 1968 | 4.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.7% |
| 1969 | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.1% |
| 1970 | 3.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +79.9% |
| 1971 | 4.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.2% |
| 1972 | 3.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.2% |
| 1973 | 2.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.9% |
| 1974 | 2.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 1975 | 8.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +257.9% |
| 1976 | 7.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 1977 | 11.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.0% |
| 1978 | 20.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +79.0% |
| 1979 | 50.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +142.5% |
| 1980 | 82.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.4% |
| 1981 | 61.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.1% |
| 1982 | 45.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.9% |
| 1983 | 49.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1984 | 32.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.8% |
| 1985 | 25.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.6% |
| 1986 | 19.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.2% |
| 1987 | 43.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +130.4% |
| 1988 | 66.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.9% |
| 1989 | 68.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1990 | 30.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.1% |
| 1991 | 73.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +143.2% |
| 1992 | 118.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.6% |
| 1993 | 44.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.3% |
| 1994 | 49.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1995 | 35.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.9% |
| 1996 | 75.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +115.9% |
| 1997 | 76.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1998 | 179.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +134.6% |
| 1999 | 100.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.1% |
| 2000 | 172.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.3% |
| 2001 | 322.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +86.9% |
| 2002 | 123.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.7% |
| 2003 | 322.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +161.2% |
| 2004 | 243.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.5% |
| 2005 | 248.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2006 | 247.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2007 | 260.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2008 | 287 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 2009 | 244.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.8% |
| 2010 | 272 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 2011 | 179.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.0% |
| 2012 | 282.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.3% |
| 2013 | 268.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 2014 | 276.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2015 | 353.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.8% |
| 2016 | 283.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.7% |
| 2017 | 241.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.7% |
| 2018 | 228.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 2019 | 197.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.7% |
| 2020 | 139.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.4% |
| 2021 | 94.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.6% |
| 2022 | 46.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.7% |
| 2023 | 41.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 19.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 42.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 11.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 50.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 49.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 82.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 78.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 30.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 179.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 247.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 123.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 322.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 258.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 179.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 353.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 80.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 41.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 139.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania, United Republic of
- 53 Türkiye 55.18 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 54 Mozambique 48.99 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 55 Trinidad and Tobago 46.78 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 57 Vanuatu 40.99 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 58 Romania 37.04 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 59 Samoa 34.76 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Tanzania, United Republic of
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 9.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 37.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 34.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 54.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 121.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 37.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 16.94 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) in Tanzania, United Republic of was 41.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The highest recorded value was 353.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2015.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre in 1969.
- How does Tanzania, United Republic of rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 56th out of 168 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) rising or falling in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Over the last ten years it is down 84.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tanzania, United Republic of data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.