Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Brazil

Brazil: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) was 57.65 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
57.65 million current US$
Change on year
up 26.4%
World rank
80th
of 164 countries
All-time high
289.38 million current US$
in 1966
All-time low
-376.00 million current US$
in 1992
Years of data
64
1960–2023

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Brazil, 1960–2023

-400.0M-200.0M0200.0M196019912023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.

Analysis

In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Brazil stood at 57.65 million current US$.

That represents a change of up 26.4% on the previous year and up 155.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Brazil peaked at 289.38 million current US$ in 1966 and was at its lowest, -376.00 million current US$, in 1992.

Brazil ranks 80th of 164 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Brazil, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled in Brazil, 1960 to 2023.
Year current US$ Change
1960 39.00 million current US$
1961 268.00 million current US$ +587.2%
1962 159.00 million current US$ -40.7%
1963 138.00 million current US$ -13.2%
1964 212.00 million current US$ +53.6%
1965 135.29 million current US$ -36.2%
1966 289.38 million current US$ +113.9%
1967 187.23 million current US$ -35.3%
1968 223.51 million current US$ +19.4%
1969 138.00 million current US$ -38.3%
1970 120.00 million current US$ -13.0%
1971 104.00 million current US$ -13.3%
1972 54.00 million current US$ -48.1%
1973 42.00 million current US$ -22.2%
1974 69.00 million current US$ +64.3%
1975 43.00 million current US$ -37.7%
1976 30.00 million current US$ -30.2%
1977 -5.00 million current US$ -116.7%
1978 -22.00 million current US$ +340.0%
1979 -27.00 million current US$ +22.7%
1980 -33.00 million current US$ +22.2%
1981 -31.00 million current US$ -6.1%
1982 -36.00 million current US$ +16.1%
1983 -13.00 million current US$ -63.9%
1984 11.00 million current US$ -184.6%
1985 -56.00 million current US$ -609.1%
1986 11.00 million current US$ -119.6%
1987 -17.00 million current US$ -254.5%
1988 6.00 million current US$ -135.3%
1989 -15.00 million current US$ -350.0%
1990 -12.00 million current US$ -20.0%
1991 3.00 million current US$ -125.0%
1992 -376.00 million current US$ -12633.3%
1993 -68.00 million current US$ -81.9%
1994 -2.00 million current US$ -97.1%
1995 -5.00 million current US$ +150.0%
1996 -7.00 million current US$ +40.0%
1997 -7.91 million current US$ +12.9%
1998 -8.81 million current US$ +11.4%
1999 -157.77 million current US$ +1690.8%
2000 -57.85 million current US$ -63.3%
2001 -70.75 million current US$ +22.3%
2002 -37.14 million current US$ -47.5%
2003 -56.08 million current US$ +51.0%
2004 -57.46 million current US$ +2.5%
2005 -25.93 million current US$ -54.9%
2006 -67.86 million current US$ +161.7%
2007 3.85 million current US$ -105.7%
2008 12.33 million current US$ +220.3%
2009 8.14 million current US$ -34.0%
2010 20.71 million current US$ +154.4%
2011 29.79 million current US$ +43.8%
2012 22.54 million current US$ -24.3%
2013 22.58 million current US$ +0.2%
2014 16.97 million current US$ -24.8%
2015 14.63 million current US$ -13.8%
2016 19.03 million current US$ +30.0%
2017 21.11 million current US$ +11.0%
2018 24.28 million current US$ +15.0%
2019 38.97 million current US$ +60.5%
2020 48.94 million current US$ +25.6%
2021 46.86 million current US$ -4.2%
2022 45.59 million current US$ -2.7%
2023 57.65 million current US$ +26.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 178.94 million current US$ 39.00 million current US$ 289.38 million current US$ 10
1970s 40.80 million current US$ -27.00 million current US$ 120.00 million current US$ 10
1980s -17.30 million current US$ -56.00 million current US$ 11.00 million current US$ 10
1990s -64.15 million current US$ -376.00 million current US$ 3.00 million current US$ 10
2000s -34.88 million current US$ -70.75 million current US$ 12.33 million current US$ 10
2010s 23.06 million current US$ 14.63 million current US$ 38.97 million current US$ 10
2020s 49.76 million current US$ 45.59 million current US$ 57.65 million current US$ 4

Countries ranked near Brazil

  1. 77 Angola 61.07 million current US$ compare
  2. 78 Eswatini 61.01 million current US$ compare
  3. 79 Kyrgyzstan 60.10 million current US$ compare
  4. 81 Armenia 56.63 million current US$ compare
  5. 82 Botswana 54.07 million current US$ compare
  6. 83 Uzbekistan 51.81 million current US$ compare

See the full ranking of 211 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Brazil

All data for Brazil →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Brazil?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Brazil was 57.65 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Brazil?
The highest recorded value was 289.38 million current US$ in 1966.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Brazil?
The lowest recorded value was -376.00 million current US$ in 1992.
How does Brazil rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Brazil ranks 80th out of 164 countries with data for 2023.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) rising or falling in Brazil?
Over the last ten years it is up 155.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Brazil data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Brazil. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Brazil</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 9,809 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.