Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Bolivia
Bolivia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) was 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
2.61 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 43.6%
World rank
145th
of 162 countries
All-time high
229.23 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2003
All-time low
0.7907 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2018
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Bolivia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Bolivia recorded 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 43.6% on the previous year and down 89.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Bolivia peaked at 229.23 current US$ per square kilometre in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0.7907 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2018.
Bolivia ranks 145th of 162 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Bolivia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 21.23 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 26.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.1% |
| 1963 | 40.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.7% |
| 1964 | 30.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1965 | 27.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 1966 | 19.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.5% |
| 1967 | 22.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.5% |
| 1968 | 34.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.2% |
| 1969 | 23.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.8% |
| 1970 | 18.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1971 | 18.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 35.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.0% |
| 1973 | 10.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.1% |
| 1974 | 22.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +118.2% |
| 1975 | 10.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.2% |
| 1976 | 15.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.5% |
| 1977 | 21.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.3% |
| 1978 | 41.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +95.7% |
| 1979 | 42.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1980 | 36.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 1981 | 21.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.5% |
| 1982 | 27.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.4% |
| 1983 | 54.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +96.7% |
| 1984 | 33.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.0% |
| 1985 | 60 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.6% |
| 1986 | 95.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.5% |
| 1987 | 71.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.2% |
| 1988 | 64.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 1989 | 63.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 1990 | 77.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.7% |
| 1991 | 74.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 1992 | 122.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.2% |
| 1993 | 93.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.1% |
| 1994 | 82.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 1995 | 82.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 86.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1997 | 150.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.4% |
| 1998 | 85.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.4% |
| 1999 | 104.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.3% |
| 2000 | 89.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 2001 | 109.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.3% |
| 2002 | 117.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 2003 | 229.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.5% |
| 2004 | 126.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.6% |
| 2005 | 128.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2006 | 178.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.3% |
| 2007 | 112.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.6% |
| 2008 | 114.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2009 | 93.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.0% |
| 2010 | 55.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.6% |
| 2011 | 54.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2012 | 46.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 2013 | 24.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.7% |
| 2014 | 32.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.5% |
| 2015 | 2 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.8% |
| 2016 | 2.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2017 | 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2018 | 0.7907 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.3% |
| 2019 | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.8% |
| 2020 | 6.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +402.2% |
| 2021 | 7.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.1% |
| 2022 | 4.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.4% |
| 2023 | 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 27.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 40.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 23.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 42.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 52.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 95.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 95.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 74.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 150.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 130.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 89.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 229.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 22.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7907 current US$ per square kilometre | 55.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 5.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bolivia
- 142 Kazakhstan 5.85 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 143 Mauritius 5.49 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 144 Equatorial Guinea 4.09 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 146 Chile 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 147 Algeria 1.62 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 148 Argentina 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Bolivia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 593,566 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 4.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 12.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 72.56 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 11.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 33.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 229.67 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 21,193 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 15.56 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Bolivia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Bolivia was 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Bolivia?
- The highest recorded value was 229.23 current US$ per square kilometre in 2003.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Bolivia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.7907 current US$ per square kilometre in 2018.
- How does Bolivia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Bolivia ranks 145th out of 162 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) rising or falling in Bolivia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 89.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bolivia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.