Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Brazil
Brazil: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) was 6.9 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
6.9 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 26.4%
World rank
141st
of 162 countries
All-time high
34.62 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1966
All-time low
-44.99 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1992
Years of data
62
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Brazil, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Brazil is 6.9 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 26.4% on the previous year and up 155.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Brazil peaked at 34.62 current US$ per square kilometre in 1966 and was at its lowest, -44.99 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1992.
Brazil ranks 141st of 162 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Brazil, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 32.06 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 19.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.7% |
| 1963 | 16.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 1964 | 25.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.6% |
| 1965 | 16.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.2% |
| 1966 | 34.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +113.9% |
| 1967 | 22.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.3% |
| 1968 | 26.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 1969 | 16.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.3% |
| 1970 | 14.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 1971 | 12.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 1972 | 6.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.1% |
| 1973 | 5.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.2% |
| 1974 | 8.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.3% |
| 1975 | 5.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.7% |
| 1976 | 3.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.2% |
| 1977 | -0.5982 current US$ per square kilometre | -116.7% |
| 1978 | -2.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +340.0% |
| 1979 | -3.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.7% |
| 1980 | -3.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 1981 | -3.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 1982 | -4.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 1983 | -1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.9% |
| 1984 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -184.6% |
| 1985 | -6.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -609.1% |
| 1986 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -119.6% |
| 1987 | -2.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -254.5% |
| 1988 | 0.7179 current US$ per square kilometre | -135.3% |
| 1989 | -1.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -350.0% |
| 1990 | -1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1991 | 0.3589 current US$ per square kilometre | -125.0% |
| 1992 | -44.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -12633.3% |
| 1993 | -8.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.9% |
| 1994 | -0.2393 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.1% |
| 1995 | -0.5982 current US$ per square kilometre | +150.0% |
| 1996 | -0.8375 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 1998 | -1.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 1999 | -18.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +1690.8% |
| 2000 | -6.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.3% |
| 2001 | -8.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.3% |
| 2002 | -4.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.5% |
| 2003 | -6.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.0% |
| 2004 | -6.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2005 | -3.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.9% |
| 2006 | -8.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +161.7% |
| 2007 | 0.4606 current US$ per square kilometre | -105.7% |
| 2008 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +220.3% |
| 2009 | 0.9739 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.0% |
| 2010 | 2.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +154.4% |
| 2011 | 3.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.8% |
| 2012 | 2.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.3% |
| 2013 | 2.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2014 | 2.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.8% |
| 2015 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 2016 | 2.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.0% |
| 2017 | 2.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 2018 | 2.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 2019 | 4.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.5% |
| 2020 | 5.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.6% |
| 2021 | 5.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 2022 | 5.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 2023 | 6.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 23.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 34.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 4.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | -2.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | -8.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3589 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2000s | -4.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 5.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 138 Turkmenistan 9.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 139 Czechia 8.54 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 140 Gabon 8.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 142 Kazakhstan 5.85 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 143 Mauritius 5.49 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 144 Equatorial Guinea 4.09 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Brazil
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 938,500 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 122.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 8.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 100.85 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 31.27 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 14.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 154.53 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Brazil?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Brazil was 6.9 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 34.62 current US$ per square kilometre in 1966.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was -44.99 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992.
- How does Brazil rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Brazil ranks 141st out of 162 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 155.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.