Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Ecuador
Ecuador: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) was 315.92 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
315.92 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 5.0%
World rank
84th
of 162 countries
All-time high
315.92 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
3.61 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1978
Years of data
62
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Ecuador stood at 315.92 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 62 years on record.
That represents a change of up 5.0% on the previous year and up 214.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Ecuador peaked at 315.92 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 3.61 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1978.
That places Ecuador 84th out of 162 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 39.73 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 43.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1963 | 50.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1964 | 61.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 1965 | 62.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1966 | 79.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.3% |
| 1967 | 82.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1968 | 45.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.8% |
| 1969 | 36.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.9% |
| 1970 | 32.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1971 | 36.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1972 | 28.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1973 | 46.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.5% |
| 1974 | 28.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.5% |
| 1975 | 21.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1976 | 39.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +83.3% |
| 1977 | 18.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.5% |
| 1978 | 3.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.0% |
| 1979 | 7.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1981 | 3.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1982 | 10.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1983 | 32.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1984 | 101.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +211.1% |
| 1985 | 158.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.1% |
| 1986 | 180.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 1987 | 155.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 1988 | 108.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.2% |
| 1989 | 54.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1990 | 97.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.0% |
| 1991 | 79.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.5% |
| 1992 | 75.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1993 | 68.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 1994 | 75.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 1995 | 46.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.1% |
| 1996 | 43.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1997 | 46.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1998 | 17.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.2% |
| 1999 | 56.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +217.5% |
| 2000 | 189.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +236.1% |
| 2001 | 222.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 2002 | 261.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 2003 | 292.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2004 | 299.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2005 | 287.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 2006 | 282.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2007 | 171.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.2% |
| 2008 | 186.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 2009 | 209.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 2010 | 93.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.6% |
| 2011 | 125.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.3% |
| 2012 | 103.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.7% |
| 2013 | 100.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2014 | 129.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.2% |
| 2015 | 59.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.5% |
| 2016 | 72.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.5% |
| 2017 | 66.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 2018 | 69.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2019 | 120.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.9% |
| 2020 | 229.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.3% |
| 2021 | 284.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 2022 | 300.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2023 | 315.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 55.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 82.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 26.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 46.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 89.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 180.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1990s | 60.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 97.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 240.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 171.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 299.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 94.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 59.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 129.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 282.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 229.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 315.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 81 Cameroon 341.62 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 82 Dominica 329.35 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 83 Belize 322.99 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 85 Kyrgyzstan 313.34 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 86 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 302.01 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 87 Morocco 299.92 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Ecuador
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 909,618 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 4.52 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 10.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.97 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 30.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 28.17 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 596,171 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.50 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 180.24 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Ecuador?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Ecuador was 315.92 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 315.92 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.61 current US$ per square kilometre in 1978.
- How does Ecuador rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Ecuador ranks 84th out of 162 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 214.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.