Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) was 426.21 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) recorded 426.21 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in 2022.
That represents a change of up 1,014.5% on the previous year and up 1,166.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 1,254 current US$ per square kilometre in 1991 and was at its lowest, -52.66 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1989.
That places Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) 22nd out of 44 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 65.78 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 76.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 1972 | 114.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1973 | 11.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -90.3% |
| 1974 | 5.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1975 | 5.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1976 | -8.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -250.0% |
| 1977 | -11.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.7% |
| 1978 | -20.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.5% |
| 1979 | 63.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -403.3% |
| 1980 | 183.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +191.2% |
| 1981 | 32.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -82.3% |
| 1982 | 237.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +629.8% |
| 1983 | 126.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.9% |
| 1984 | 75.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.1% |
| 1985 | 26.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.1% |
| 1986 | 27.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1987 | -25.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -192.5% |
| 1988 | -39.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.1% |
| 1989 | -52.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.4% |
| 1990 | 180.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -443.4% |
| 1991 | 1,254 current US$ per square kilometre | +593.4% |
| 1992 | 9.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -99.3% |
| 1993 | 63.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +589.2% |
| 1994 | 59.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 1995 | 30.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.9% |
| 1996 | 50.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.1% |
| 1997 | 27.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.7% |
| 1998 | 43.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.7% |
| 1999 | 98.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +126.8% |
| 2000 | 86.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 2001 | 80.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 2002 | 120.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.5% |
| 2003 | 73.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.3% |
| 2004 | 74.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2005 | 35.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.2% |
| 2006 | 39.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 2007 | 31.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.9% |
| 2008 | 51.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.0% |
| 2009 | 48.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 2010 | 38.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.7% |
| 2011 | 32.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.8% |
| 2012 | 33.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2013 | 36.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 2014 | 39.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2015 | 33.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.0% |
| 2016 | 27.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 2017 | 31.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 2018 | 30.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2019 | 30.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2020 | 30.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2021 | 38.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.6% |
| 2022 | 426.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +1014.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 30.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 114.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 59.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 237.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 181.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,254 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 64.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 120.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 33.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 39.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 164.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 30.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 426.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
- 19 Bangladesh 3,461 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Uganda 3,407 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 21 Burundi 3,394 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 22 Tuvalu 3,333 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Timor-Leste 2,882 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Lesotho 2,785 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Guatemala 2,185 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 227.32 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 75.39 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.22 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 12.13 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 452.60 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.56 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.39 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 495.74 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 437.73 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.13 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) was 426.21 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 1,254 current US$ per square kilometre in 1991.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was -52.66 current US$ per square kilometre in 1989.
- How does Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 22nd out of 44 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,166.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.