Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia
Europe & Central Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) was 468.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
468.12 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 30.5%
Rank
17th
of 44 groups
All-time high
468.12 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
-10.96 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1990
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Europe & Central Asia recorded 468.12 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
The figure is up 30.5% on the previous year and up 1,338.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia peaked at 468.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, -10.96 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1990.
Europe & Central Asia ranks 17th of 44 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 52.97 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 64.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.4% |
| 1963 | 56.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 1964 | 38.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.2% |
| 1965 | 36.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1966 | 39.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1967 | 17.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.8% |
| 1968 | 14.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.3% |
| 1969 | 10.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.3% |
| 1970 | 11.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1971 | 18.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.3% |
| 1972 | 31.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +74.0% |
| 1973 | -4.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -113.8% |
| 1974 | -6.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.8% |
| 1975 | -4.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.3% |
| 1976 | -4.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1977 | -2.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1978 | -8.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +275.0% |
| 1979 | 13.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -266.7% |
| 1980 | 49.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +258.7% |
| 1981 | 7.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.5% |
| 1982 | 61.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +761.5% |
| 1983 | 32.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.6% |
| 1984 | 19.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.1% |
| 1985 | 9.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.5% |
| 1986 | 11.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 1987 | -3.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -132.3% |
| 1988 | -7.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +110.0% |
| 1989 | -10.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.7% |
| 1990 | -10.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1991 | 44.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -505.0% |
| 1992 | -0.1845 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.4% |
| 1993 | 16.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -8880.6% |
| 1994 | 7.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.4% |
| 1995 | 13.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +86.1% |
| 1996 | 14.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1997 | 8.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 1998 | 13.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.2% |
| 1999 | 20.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.9% |
| 2000 | 22.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 2001 | 30.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.0% |
| 2002 | 56.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +84.5% |
| 2003 | 30.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.1% |
| 2004 | 29.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 2005 | 29.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2006 | 37.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.4% |
| 2007 | 32.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 2008 | 49.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.1% |
| 2009 | 49.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2010 | 33.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.2% |
| 2011 | 28.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.3% |
| 2012 | 29.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 2013 | 32.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 2014 | 35.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2015 | 29.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 2016 | 24.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.4% |
| 2017 | 27.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 2018 | 27.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2019 | 27.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2020 | 27.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2021 | 33.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.8% |
| 2022 | 358.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +954.9% |
| 2023 | 468.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 36.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 64.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 16.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 61.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 12.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 44.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 36.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 56.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 29.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 35.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 221.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 468.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia
- 14 Malawi 4,574 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Syrian Arab Republic 4,518 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Tonga 4,194 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Jamaica 4,147 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 Eswatini 3,547 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Bangladesh 3,461 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Uganda 3,407 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 197.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 85.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.03 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 23.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 419.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.28 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 636.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 416.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 92.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia was 468.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 468.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was -10.96 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990.
- How does Europe & Central Asia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Europe & Central Asia ranks 17th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,338.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.