Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Lower middle income
Lower middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) was 517.82 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
517.82 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 39.9%
Rank
14th
of 44 groups
All-time high
517.82 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
57.27 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1976
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Lower middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Lower middle income is 517.82 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 39.9% on the previous year and up 23.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Lower middle income peaked at 517.82 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 57.27 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1976.
Lower middle income ranks 14th of 44 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Lower middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 78.64 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 89.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 1963 | 105.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 1964 | 112.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1965 | 111.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 1966 | 104.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 1967 | 106.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1968 | 89.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.8% |
| 1969 | 81.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 1970 | 76.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1971 | 81.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1972 | 72.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 1973 | 65.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 1974 | 81.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.7% |
| 1975 | 77.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 1976 | 57.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.5% |
| 1977 | 61.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1978 | 78.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.3% |
| 1979 | 75.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1980 | 97.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.0% |
| 1981 | 103.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1982 | 101.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1983 | 117.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.7% |
| 1984 | 139.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.2% |
| 1985 | 149.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1986 | 149.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1987 | 134.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 1988 | 123.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 1989 | 128.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1990 | 219.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.4% |
| 1991 | 256.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 1992 | 165.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.4% |
| 1993 | 122.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.9% |
| 1994 | 122.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1995 | 96.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.7% |
| 1996 | 76.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.1% |
| 1997 | 75.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1998 | 90.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 1999 | 108.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.1% |
| 2000 | 112 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2001 | 157.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.7% |
| 2002 | 167.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2003 | 191.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.6% |
| 2004 | 175.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 2005 | 173.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2006 | 232.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.3% |
| 2007 | 214.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 2008 | 282.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.5% |
| 2009 | 322.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 2010 | 382.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 2011 | 383.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2012 | 357.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 2013 | 419.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 2014 | 386.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 2015 | 356.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 2016 | 393.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 2017 | 409.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2018 | 429.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.9% |
| 2019 | 365.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.0% |
| 2020 | 411.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 2021 | 451.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2022 | 370.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.0% |
| 2023 | 517.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 97.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 78.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 112.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 72.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 57.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 81.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 124.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 97.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 149.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 133.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 75.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 256.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 202.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 112 current US$ per square kilometre | 322.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 388.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 356.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 429.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 437.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 370.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 517.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Lower middle income
- 11 Rwanda 7,252 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Maldives 5,524 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Republic of Moldova 5,481 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Malawi 4,574 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Syria 4,518 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Tonga 4,194 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Jamaica 4,147 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Lower middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 83.14 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 179.59 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.02 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.38 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 654.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 3.26 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.64 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 725.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 268.87 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 8.40 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Lower middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) in Lower middle income was 517.82 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Lower middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 517.82 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) recorded in Lower middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 57.27 current US$ per square kilometre in 1976.
- How does Lower middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Lower middle income ranks 14th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) rising or falling in Lower middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 23.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lower middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.