Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) in South Asia
South Asia: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) was 43.13 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD in South Asia, 1979–2023
Source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2023, net official flows from un agencies, ifad in South Asia stood at 43.13 million current US$.
That represents a change of down 41.7% on the previous year and down 7.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, ifad in South Asia peaked at 100.07 million current US$ in 2016 and was at its lowest, 1.24 million current US$, in 1979.
South Asia ranks 20th of 45 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) in South Asia, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1979 | 1.24 million current US$ | — |
| 1980 | 19.20 million current US$ | +1448.4% |
| 1981 | 26.17 million current US$ | +36.3% |
| 1982 | 21.00 million current US$ | -19.8% |
| 1983 | 23.71 million current US$ | +12.9% |
| 1984 | 27.90 million current US$ | +17.7% |
| 1985 | 63.78 million current US$ | +128.6% |
| 1986 | 61.81 million current US$ | -3.1% |
| 1987 | 77.38 million current US$ | +25.2% |
| 1988 | 26.51 million current US$ | -65.7% |
| 1989 | 31.79 million current US$ | +19.9% |
| 1990 | 55.59 million current US$ | +74.9% |
| 1991 | 14.36 million current US$ | -74.2% |
| 1992 | 10.37 million current US$ | -27.8% |
| 1993 | 5.17 million current US$ | -50.1% |
| 1994 | 9.53 million current US$ | +84.3% |
| 1995 | 10.15 million current US$ | +6.5% |
| 1996 | 15.97 million current US$ | +57.3% |
| 1997 | 17.66 million current US$ | +10.6% |
| 1998 | 20.58 million current US$ | +16.5% |
| 1999 | 20.64 million current US$ | +0.3% |
| 2000 | 18.61 million current US$ | -9.8% |
| 2001 | 19.81 million current US$ | +6.4% |
| 2002 | 17.67 million current US$ | -10.8% |
| 2003 | 17.24 million current US$ | -2.4% |
| 2004 | 7.68 million current US$ | -55.5% |
| 2005 | 17.03 million current US$ | +121.7% |
| 2006 | 23.73 million current US$ | +39.3% |
| 2007 | 18.47 million current US$ | -22.2% |
| 2008 | 12.85 million current US$ | -30.4% |
| 2009 | 25.47 million current US$ | +98.2% |
| 2010 | 39.10 million current US$ | +53.5% |
| 2011 | 65.93 million current US$ | +68.6% |
| 2012 | 48.15 million current US$ | -27.0% |
| 2013 | 46.61 million current US$ | -3.2% |
| 2014 | 49.13 million current US$ | +5.4% |
| 2015 | 50.29 million current US$ | +2.4% |
| 2016 | 100.07 million current US$ | +99.0% |
| 2017 | 67.92 million current US$ | -32.1% |
| 2018 | 52.99 million current US$ | -22.0% |
| 2019 | 84.83 million current US$ | +60.1% |
| 2020 | 46.41 million current US$ | -45.3% |
| 2021 | 57.28 million current US$ | +23.4% |
| 2022 | 74.03 million current US$ | +29.2% |
| 2023 | 43.13 million current US$ | -41.7% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) in South Asia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980 | +1448.4% | 1.24 million current US$ | 19.20 million current US$ |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.24 million current US$ | 1.24 million current US$ | 1.24 million current US$ | 1 |
| 1980s | 37.92 million current US$ | 19.20 million current US$ | 77.38 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 18.00 million current US$ | 5.17 million current US$ | 55.59 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 17.86 million current US$ | 7.68 million current US$ | 25.47 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 60.50 million current US$ | 39.10 million current US$ | 100.07 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 55.21 million current US$ | 43.13 million current US$ | 74.03 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near South Asia
- 17 Chad 12.44 million current US$ compare
- 18 Uganda 11.22 million current US$ compare
- 19 Mauritania 10.97 million current US$ compare
- 20 Tajikistan 10.20 million current US$ compare
- 21 Central African Republic 9.43 million current US$ compare
- 22 Rwanda 9.23 million current US$ compare
- 23 Democratic Republic of Congo 8.95 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for South Asia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 21.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 2.34 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 155.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 378.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 89.77 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 696.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 274.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 190.51 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 25.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.96 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, ifad in South Asia?
- Net official flows from un agencies, ifad in South Asia was 43.13 million current US$ in 2023, according to Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, ifad recorded in South Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 100.07 million current US$ in 2016.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, ifad recorded in South Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.24 million current US$ in 1979.
- How does South Asia rank for net official flows from un agencies, ifad?
- South Asia ranks 20th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, ifad rising or falling in South Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 7.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this South Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 45 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies are the net disbursements of total official flows from the UN agencies. Total official flows are the sum of Official Development Assistance (ODA) or official aid and Other Official Flows (OOF) and represent the total disbursements by the official sector at large to the recipient country. Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. OOF are transactions by the official sector whose main objective is other than development-motivated, or, if development-motivated, whose grant element is below the 25 per cent threshold which would make them eligible to be recorded as ODA. The main classes of transactions included here are official export credits, official sector equity and portfolio investment, and debt reorganization undertaken by the official sector at nonconcessional terms (irrespective of the nature or the identity of the original creditor). UN agencies are United Nations includes the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), World Food Programme (WFP), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), United Nations Development Programme(UNDP), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), United Nations Regular Programme for Technical Assistance (UNTA), United Nations Peacebuilding Fund (UNPBF), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Labour Organization (ILO), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) and United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR). Data are in current U.S. dollars.