Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled in Brazil
Brazil: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled was 329,765 current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled in Brazil, 1968–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2022, net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled in Brazil stood at 329,765 current US$.
The figure is up 5.9% on the previous year and down 65.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled in Brazil peaked at 13.24 million current US$ in 1989 and was at its lowest, -390,000 current US$, in 2000.
That places Brazil 131st out of 177 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled in Brazil, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1968 | 2.97 million current US$ | — |
| 1969 | 3.13 million current US$ | +5.4% |
| 1970 | 3.47 million current US$ | +10.9% |
| 1971 | 3.95 million current US$ | +13.8% |
| 1972 | 4.37 million current US$ | +10.6% |
| 1973 | 5.22 million current US$ | +19.5% |
| 1974 | 5.37 million current US$ | +2.9% |
| 1975 | 8.64 million current US$ | +60.9% |
| 1976 | 7.06 million current US$ | -18.3% |
| 1977 | 6.73 million current US$ | -4.7% |
| 1978 | 8.85 million current US$ | +31.5% |
| 1979 | 10.87 million current US$ | +22.8% |
| 1980 | 11.57 million current US$ | +6.4% |
| 1981 | 9.70 million current US$ | -16.2% |
| 1982 | 8.81 million current US$ | -9.2% |
| 1983 | 8.80 million current US$ | -0.1% |
| 1984 | 6.86 million current US$ | -22.0% |
| 1985 | 5.86 million current US$ | -14.6% |
| 1986 | 6.92 million current US$ | +18.1% |
| 1987 | 7.62 million current US$ | +10.1% |
| 1988 | 12.70 million current US$ | +66.7% |
| 1989 | 13.24 million current US$ | +4.3% |
| 1990 | 5.12 million current US$ | -61.3% |
| 1991 | 3.72 million current US$ | -27.3% |
| 1992 | 3.02 million current US$ | -18.8% |
| 1993 | 2.74 million current US$ | -9.3% |
| 1994 | 630,000 current US$ | -77.0% |
| 1995 | 2.49 million current US$ | +295.2% |
| 1996 | 2.97 million current US$ | +19.3% |
| 1997 | 1.87 million current US$ | -37.0% |
| 1998 | 900,000 current US$ | -51.9% |
| 1999 | 300,000 current US$ | -66.7% |
| 2000 | -390,000 current US$ | -230.0% |
| 2001 | 320,000 current US$ | -182.1% |
| 2002 | 400,000 current US$ | +25.0% |
| 2003 | 990,000 current US$ | +147.5% |
| 2004 | 1.11 million current US$ | +12.1% |
| 2005 | 670,000 current US$ | -39.6% |
| 2006 | 960,000 current US$ | +43.3% |
| 2007 | 370,000 current US$ | -61.5% |
| 2008 | 500,000 current US$ | +35.1% |
| 2009 | 920,000 current US$ | +84.0% |
| 2010 | 1.38 million current US$ | +50.0% |
| 2011 | 960,000 current US$ | -30.4% |
| 2012 | 953,420 current US$ | -0.7% |
| 2013 | 937,383 current US$ | -1.7% |
| 2014 | 444,285 current US$ | -52.6% |
| 2015 | 429,041 current US$ | -3.4% |
| 2016 | 184,920 current US$ | -56.9% |
| 2017 | 150,000 current US$ | -18.9% |
| 2018 | 150,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 359,480 current US$ | +139.7% |
| 2020 | 188,029 current US$ | -47.7% |
| 2021 | 311,390 current US$ | +65.6% |
| 2022 | 329,765 current US$ | +5.9% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 329,765 current US$ is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 633,190 current US$, 52% of the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 329,765 current US$ is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 370,384 current US$, 89% of the median. (38 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled in Brazil changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | +295.2% | 630,000 current US$ | 2.49 million current US$ |
| 2000 | -230.0% | 300,000 current US$ | -390,000 current US$ |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.05 million current US$ | 2.97 million current US$ | 3.13 million current US$ | 2 |
| 1970s | 6.45 million current US$ | 3.47 million current US$ | 10.87 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 9.21 million current US$ | 5.86 million current US$ | 13.24 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.38 million current US$ | 300,000 current US$ | 5.12 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 585,000 current US$ | -390,000 current US$ | 1.11 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 594,853 current US$ | 150,000 current US$ | 1.38 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 276,395 current US$ | 188,029 current US$ | 329,765 current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
More aid effectiveness data for Brazil
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 938,500 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.28 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 122.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 8.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 100.85 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 31.27 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 14.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 154.53 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled in Brazil?
- Net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled in Brazil was 329,765 current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 13.24 million current US$ in 1989.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was -390,000 current US$ in 2000.
- How does Brazil rank for net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled?
- Brazil ranks 131st out of 177 countries with data for 2022.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is down 65.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$) with 97 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$) with 97 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.