Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics
Central Europe and the Baltics: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled was 900,000 current US$ in 2010. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics, 1990–2010
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics is 900,000 current US$, measured in 2010.
That represents a change of down 29.7% on the previous year and down 70.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics peaked at 5.96 million current US$ in 1999 and was at its lowest, 550,000 current US$, in 2005.
That places Central Europe and the Baltics 26th out of 44 groups with data for 2010, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 3.14 million current US$ | — |
| 1991 | 1.60 million current US$ | -49.0% |
| 1992 | 1.49 million current US$ | -6.9% |
| 1993 | 1.77 million current US$ | +18.8% |
| 1994 | 2.34 million current US$ | +32.2% |
| 1995 | 2.60 million current US$ | +11.1% |
| 1996 | 3.36 million current US$ | +29.2% |
| 1997 | 3.05 million current US$ | -9.2% |
| 1998 | 4.98 million current US$ | +63.3% |
| 1999 | 5.96 million current US$ | +19.7% |
| 2000 | 3.03 million current US$ | -49.2% |
| 2001 | 3.12 million current US$ | +3.0% |
| 2002 | 2.57 million current US$ | -17.6% |
| 2003 | 3.33 million current US$ | +29.6% |
| 2004 | 3.36 million current US$ | +0.9% |
| 2005 | 550,000 current US$ | -83.6% |
| 2006 | 930,000 current US$ | +69.1% |
| 2007 | 980,000 current US$ | +5.4% |
| 2008 | 1.53 million current US$ | +56.1% |
| 2009 | 1.28 million current US$ | -16.3% |
| 2010 | 900,000 current US$ | -29.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.03 million current US$ | 1.49 million current US$ | 5.96 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.07 million current US$ | 550,000 current US$ | 3.36 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 900,000 current US$ | 900,000 current US$ | 900,000 current US$ | 1 |
Countries ranked near Central Europe and the Baltics
- 23 Nepal 6.60 million current US$ compare
- 24 Sierra Leone 6.28 million current US$ compare
- 25 Rwanda 6.03 million current US$ compare
- 26 Bangladesh 5.94 million current US$ compare
- 27 Haiti 5.67 million current US$ compare
- 28 Nigeria 5.26 million current US$ compare
- 29 Benin 4.84 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Central Europe and the Baltics
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.74 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 110,000 current US$ (2009)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 105.39 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 70,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.53 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.77 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.05 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 280,000 current US$ (2011)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.88 million current US$ (2010)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled in Central Europe and the Baltics was 900,000 current US$ in 2010, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The highest recorded value was 5.96 million current US$ in 1999.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled recorded in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- The lowest recorded value was 550,000 current US$ in 2005.
- How does Central Europe and the Baltics rank for net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled?
- Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 26th out of 44 groups with data for 2010.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled rising or falling in Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Over the last ten years it is down 70.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Central Europe and the Baltics data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$) with 97 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$) with 97 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.