Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP was 0 current US$ in 2023. ▼ Falling
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, 1968–2023
Source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net official flows from un agencies, undp in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan is 0 current US$, measured in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 56 years on record.
That represents a change of down 100.0% on the previous year and down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, undp in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan peaked at 93.41 million current US$ in 1989 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$, in 2023.
That places Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan 29th out of 47 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 56 years of available data.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1968 | 62.59 million current US$ | — |
| 1969 | 25.09 million current US$ | -59.9% |
| 1970 | 37.18 million current US$ | +48.2% |
| 1971 | 42.95 million current US$ | +15.5% |
| 1972 | 49.42 million current US$ | +15.1% |
| 1973 | 51.93 million current US$ | +5.1% |
| 1974 | 43.25 million current US$ | -16.7% |
| 1975 | 63.76 million current US$ | +47.4% |
| 1976 | 50.52 million current US$ | -20.8% |
| 1977 | 54.75 million current US$ | +8.4% |
| 1978 | 62.22 million current US$ | +13.6% |
| 1979 | 81.89 million current US$ | +31.6% |
| 1980 | 83.06 million current US$ | +1.4% |
| 1981 | 93.12 million current US$ | +12.1% |
| 1982 | 90.30 million current US$ | -3.0% |
| 1983 | 90.96 million current US$ | +0.7% |
| 1984 | 73.49 million current US$ | -19.2% |
| 1985 | 73.89 million current US$ | +0.5% |
| 1986 | 84.47 million current US$ | +14.3% |
| 1987 | 65.45 million current US$ | -22.5% |
| 1988 | 72.10 million current US$ | +10.2% |
| 1989 | 93.41 million current US$ | +29.6% |
| 1990 | 80.52 million current US$ | -13.8% |
| 1991 | 77.92 million current US$ | -3.2% |
| 1992 | 74.25 million current US$ | -4.7% |
| 1993 | 64.11 million current US$ | -13.7% |
| 1994 | 55.13 million current US$ | -14.0% |
| 1995 | 40.26 million current US$ | -27.0% |
| 1996 | 44.36 million current US$ | +10.2% |
| 1997 | 60.62 million current US$ | +36.7% |
| 1998 | 56.05 million current US$ | -7.5% |
| 1999 | 19.01 million current US$ | -66.1% |
| 2000 | 30.64 million current US$ | +61.2% |
| 2001 | 26.22 million current US$ | -14.4% |
| 2002 | 31.97 million current US$ | +21.9% |
| 2003 | 23.22 million current US$ | -27.4% |
| 2004 | 34.41 million current US$ | +48.2% |
| 2005 | 32.54 million current US$ | -5.4% |
| 2006 | 33.77 million current US$ | +3.8% |
| 2007 | 37.47 million current US$ | +11.0% |
| 2008 | 44.74 million current US$ | +19.4% |
| 2009 | 52.74 million current US$ | +17.9% |
| 2010 | 51.31 million current US$ | -2.7% |
| 2011 | 48.16 million current US$ | -6.1% |
| 2012 | 42.81 million current US$ | -11.1% |
| 2013 | 43.80 million current US$ | +2.3% |
| 2014 | 35.49 million current US$ | -19.0% |
| 2015 | 33.88 million current US$ | -4.5% |
| 2016 | 25.39 million current US$ | -25.1% |
| 2017 | 21.40 million current US$ | -15.7% |
| 2018 | 14.90 million current US$ | -30.4% |
| 2019 | 20.29 million current US$ | +36.2% |
| 2020 | 22.42 million current US$ | +10.5% |
| 2021 | 27.23 million current US$ | +21.4% |
| 2022 | 48.03 million current US$ | +76.4% |
| 2023 | 0 current US$ | -100.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 43.84 million current US$ | 25.09 million current US$ | 62.59 million current US$ | 2 |
| 1970s | 53.79 million current US$ | 37.18 million current US$ | 81.89 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 82.03 million current US$ | 65.45 million current US$ | 93.41 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 57.22 million current US$ | 19.01 million current US$ | 80.52 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 34.77 million current US$ | 23.22 million current US$ | 52.74 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 33.74 million current US$ | 14.90 million current US$ | 51.31 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 24.42 million current US$ | 0 current US$ | 48.03 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
- 26 Bangladesh 5.94 million current US$ compare
- 27 Haiti 5.67 million current US$ compare
- 28 Nigeria 5.26 million current US$ compare
- 29 Benin 4.84 million current US$ compare
- 30 Gambia 4.83 million current US$ compare
- 31 Guinea-Bissau 4.50 million current US$ compare
- 32 Cambodia 4.34 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 76.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 92.27 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 582.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 2.51 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 387.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 3.31 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.27 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 708.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 256.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.83 billion current US$ (2023)
All data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, undp in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- Net official flows from un agencies, undp in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan was 0 current US$ in 2023, according to Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, undp recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 93.41 million current US$ in 1989.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, undp recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ in 2023.
- How does Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan rank for net official flows from un agencies, undp?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 29th out of 47 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, undp rising or falling in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 56 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies are the net disbursements of total official flows from the UN agencies. Total official flows are the sum of Official Development Assistance (ODA) or official aid and Other Official Flows (OOF) and represent the total disbursements by the official sector at large to the recipient country. Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. OOF are transactions by the official sector whose main objective is other than development-motivated, or, if development-motivated, whose grant element is below the 25 per cent threshold which would make them eligible to be recorded as ODA. The main classes of transactions included here are official export credits, official sector equity and portfolio investment, and debt reorganization undertaken by the official sector at nonconcessional terms (irrespective of the nature or the identity of the original creditor). UN agencies are United Nations includes the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), World Food Programme (WFP), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), United Nations Development Programme(UNDP), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), United Nations Regular Programme for Technical Assistance (UNTA), United Nations Peacebuilding Fund (UNPBF), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Labour Organization (ILO), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) and United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR). Data are in current U.S. dollars.