Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per square in Cuba
Cuba: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per square was 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009. ▼ Falling
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per square in Cuba, 1991–2009
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2009, net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per square in Cuba stood at 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 39.1% on the previous year and down 57.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per square in Cuba peaked at 6.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992 and was at its lowest, 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2007.
That places Cuba 98th out of 128 countries with data for 2009, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 19 years of available data.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per square in Cuba, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1991 | 2.42 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1992 | 6.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +180.8% |
| 1993 | 2.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.1% |
| 1994 | 3.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.5% |
| 1995 | 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.7% |
| 1996 | 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.0% |
| 1997 | 3.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1998 | 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 1999 | 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2000 | 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.2% |
| 2001 | 4.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.7% |
| 2002 | 4.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2003 | 3.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 2004 | 3.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 2005 | 2.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.5% |
| 2006 | 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 2007 | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.0% |
| 2008 | 2.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.9% |
| 2009 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2000s | 2.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 95 Tunisia 1.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 96 Indonesia 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 97 Ecuador 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 99 Mali 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 100 Guatemala 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 101 Costa Rica 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Cuba
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 142,165 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 582,429 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.99 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 16.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 6.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 18.49 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 550,653 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.00 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per square in Cuba?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per square in Cuba was 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per square recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 6.8 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per square recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007.
- How does Cuba rank for net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per square?
- Cuba ranks 98th out of 128 countries with data for 2009.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per square rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 57.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.