Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled in Croatia
Croatia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled was 390,000 current US$ in 2010. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled in Croatia, 1994–2010
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled in Croatia is 390,000 current US$, measured in 2010.
That represents a change of up 21.9% on the previous year and up 116.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled in Croatia peaked at 3.47 million current US$ in 1996 and was at its lowest, 50,000 current US$, in 1999.
That places Croatia 127th out of 142 countries with data for 2010, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled in Croatia, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1994 | 130,000 current US$ | — |
| 1995 | 2.13 million current US$ | +1538.5% |
| 1996 | 3.47 million current US$ | +62.9% |
| 1997 | 160,000 current US$ | -95.4% |
| 1998 | 230,000 current US$ | +43.8% |
| 1999 | 50,000 current US$ | -78.3% |
| 2000 | 180,000 current US$ | +260.0% |
| 2001 | 183,333 current US$ | +1.9% |
| 2002 | 186,667 current US$ | +1.8% |
| 2003 | 190,000 current US$ | +1.8% |
| 2004 | 220,000 current US$ | +15.8% |
| 2005 | 240,000 current US$ | +9.1% |
| 2006 | 280,000 current US$ | +16.7% |
| 2007 | 300,000 current US$ | +7.1% |
| 2008 | 380,000 current US$ | +26.7% |
| 2009 | 320,000 current US$ | -15.8% |
| 2010 | 390,000 current US$ | +21.9% |
Croatia compared with similar countries
- Croatia's 390,000 current US$ is below the median for high income countries, which is 465,000 current US$, 84% of the median. (20 countries reporting)
- Croatia's 390,000 current US$ is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.06 million current US$, 37% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled in Croatia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | +1538.5% | 130,000 current US$ | 2.13 million current US$ |
| 2000 | +260.0% | 50,000 current US$ | 180,000 current US$ |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.03 million current US$ | 50,000 current US$ | 3.47 million current US$ | 6 |
| 2000s | 248,000 current US$ | 180,000 current US$ | 380,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 390,000 current US$ | 390,000 current US$ | 390,000 current US$ | 1 |
Countries ranked near Croatia
More aid effectiveness data for Croatia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 5.74 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 110,000 current US$ (2009)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 105.39 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 70,000 current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 22.53 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.77 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.05 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -1.61 million current US$ (2010)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.88 million current US$ (2010)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled in Croatia?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled in Croatia was 390,000 current US$ in 2010, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled recorded in Croatia?
- The highest recorded value was 3.47 million current US$ in 1996.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled recorded in Croatia?
- The lowest recorded value was 50,000 current US$ in 1999.
- How does Croatia rank for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled?
- Croatia ranks 127th out of 142 countries with data for 2010.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled rising or falling in Croatia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 116.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Croatia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) with 70 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) with 70 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.