Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Africa Western and Central
Africa Western and Central: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square was 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Africa Western and Central, 1970–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2008, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Africa Western and Central stood at 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 70.2% on the previous year and down 50.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Africa Western and Central peaked at 6.45 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0.4024 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1980.
That places Africa Western and Central 13th out of 47 groups with data for 2008, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Africa Western and Central, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.5582 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0.4875 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 1972 | 0.5726 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 1973 | 0.5792 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1974 | 0.6787 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.2% |
| 1975 | 0.6954 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1976 | 0.8855 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.3% |
| 1977 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 1978 | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 1979 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 1980 | 0.4024 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.7% |
| 1981 | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +278.6% |
| 1982 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1983 | 2 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.2% |
| 1984 | 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.1% |
| 1985 | 2.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.6% |
| 1986 | 2.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 1987 | 2.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 1988 | 2.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 1989 | 2.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.0% |
| 1990 | 2.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1991 | 3.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.7% |
| 1992 | 2.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 1993 | 4.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.4% |
| 1994 | 3.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.9% |
| 1995 | 6.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +88.0% |
| 1996 | 2.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.5% |
| 1997 | 3.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.9% |
| 1998 | 3.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 1999 | 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.2% |
| 2000 | 5.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2001 | 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.6% |
| 2002 | 5.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.3% |
| 2003 | 5.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 2004 | 5.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2005 | 6.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 2006 | 3.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.2% |
| 2007 | 5.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.0% |
| 2008 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.784 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4875 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4024 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
Countries ranked near Africa Western and Central
- 10 Antigua and Barbuda 681.82 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Barbados 581.39 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Marshall Islands 444.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Tonga 375 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Dominica 373.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Mauritius 285.71 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 British Virgin Islands 266.67 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Africa Western and Central
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 16.65 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 125.72 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 310.97 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 1.72 billion current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 216.58 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.07 billion current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.82 billion current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 592.48 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 88.12 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 363.44 million current US$ (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Africa Western and Central?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Africa Western and Central was 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Africa Western and Central?
- The highest recorded value was 6.45 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Africa Western and Central?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4024 current US$ per square kilometre in 1980.
- How does Africa Western and Central rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Africa Western and Central ranks 13th out of 47 groups with data for 2008.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square rising or falling in Africa Western and Central?
- Over the last ten years it is down 50.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Africa Western and Central data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 39 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.