Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Early-demographic dividend
Early-demographic dividend: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square was 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008. ◆ Volatile
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Early-demographic dividend, 1970–2008
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Early-demographic dividend recorded 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in 2008.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 70.4% on the previous year and down 49.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Early-demographic dividend peaked at 5.37 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0.2835 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1980.
That places Early-demographic dividend 15th out of 47 groups with data for 2008, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square in Early-demographic dividend, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.4062 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0.4352 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1972 | 0.4978 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 1973 | 0.5467 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 1974 | 0.6933 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.8% |
| 1975 | 0.6158 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 1976 | 0.701 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 1977 | 0.871 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.3% |
| 1978 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 1979 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 1980 | 0.2835 current US$ per square kilometre | -72.6% |
| 1981 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +366.4% |
| 1982 | 1.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1983 | 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.2% |
| 1984 | 1.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.8% |
| 1985 | 2.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.5% |
| 1986 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.7% |
| 1987 | 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.2% |
| 1988 | 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.4% |
| 1989 | 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.9% |
| 1990 | 2.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.2% |
| 1991 | 2.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.3% |
| 1992 | 2.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.7% |
| 1993 | 3.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.9% |
| 1994 | 2.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.3% |
| 1995 | 5.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +135.3% |
| 1996 | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.2% |
| 1997 | 3.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.7% |
| 1998 | 2.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.6% |
| 1999 | 3.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.3% |
| 2000 | 3.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2001 | 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 2002 | 3.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 2003 | 3.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 2004 | 3.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 2005 | 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.5% |
| 2006 | 2.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.6% |
| 2007 | 3.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.7% |
| 2008 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.6832 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4062 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2835 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
Countries ranked near Early-demographic dividend
- 12 Marshall Islands 444.44 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Tonga 375 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Dominica 373.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Mauritius 285.71 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 British Virgin Islands 266.67 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Sao Tome and Principe 208.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 Maldives 200 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Early-demographic dividend
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 171.18 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 148.03 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 907.63 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.23 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 543.05 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 4.19 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.32 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 919.02 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 374.37 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 8.62 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Early-demographic dividend?
- Net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square in Early-demographic dividend was 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Early-demographic dividend?
- The highest recorded value was 5.37 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995.
- What is the lowest net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square recorded in Early-demographic dividend?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2835 current US$ per square kilometre in 1980.
- How does Early-demographic dividend rank for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square?
- Early-demographic dividend ranks 15th out of 47 groups with data for 2008.
- Is net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), per square rising or falling in Early-demographic dividend?
- Over the last ten years it is down 49.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Early-demographic dividend data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 39 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.