Tanzania vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia … Australia square

Tanzania
2.78 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
2.99 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania rank
75th
Zambia rank
74th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia … Australia square over time

  • Tanzania
  • Zambia
051015196519942023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 0.21 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Tanzania ahead.

Tanzania ranks 75th and Zambia ranks 74th of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Tanzania averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1152 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1022 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0129 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1970s 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3847 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8402 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1980s 6.33 current US$ per square kilometre 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1990s 2.46 current US$ per square kilometre 2.44 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0229 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2000s 1.67 current US$ per square kilometre 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre 0.511 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 7.1 current US$ per square kilometre 4.91 current US$ per square kilometre 2.19 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2020s 2.21 current US$ per square kilometre 2.32 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1041 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per, Tanzania or Zambia?
Zambia, at 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per between Tanzania and Zambia?
0.21 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and Zambia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Tanzania and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
Tanzania ranks 75th and Zambia ranks 74th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-australia-current-us-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/zambia/">Tanzania vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 7,203 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.