Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Zambia
Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per was 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
2.99 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 136.9%
World rank
74th
of 160 countries
All-time high
12.23 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2011
All-time low
0.0404 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1965
Years of data
59
1965–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Zambia, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Zambia stood at 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is up 136.9% on the previous year and down 68.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Zambia peaked at 12.23 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.0404 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1965.
That places Zambia 74th out of 160 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Zambia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 0.0404 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0.1076 current US$ per square kilometre | +166.7% |
| 1967 | 0.0807 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1968 | 0.1749 current US$ per square kilometre | +116.7% |
| 1969 | 0.1076 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.5% |
| 1970 | 0.3094 current US$ per square kilometre | +187.5% |
| 1971 | 0.2152 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.4% |
| 1972 | 0.1749 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.7% |
| 1973 | 0.2959 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.2% |
| 1974 | 0.7264 current US$ per square kilometre | +145.5% |
| 1975 | 0.269 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.0% |
| 1976 | 0.1211 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.0% |
| 1977 | 0.1345 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1978 | 0.6322 current US$ per square kilometre | +370.0% |
| 1979 | 0.9685 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.2% |
| 1980 | 0.7399 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.6% |
| 1981 | 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.5% |
| 1982 | 4.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +225.2% |
| 1983 | 3.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 1984 | 4.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1985 | 2.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.9% |
| 1986 | 0.5784 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.2% |
| 1987 | 0.4843 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 1988 | 4.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +769.4% |
| 1989 | 0.9147 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.3% |
| 1990 | 3 current US$ per square kilometre | +227.9% |
| 1991 | 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1992 | 4.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.5% |
| 1993 | 3.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 1994 | 2.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 1995 | 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.3% |
| 1996 | 2.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.7% |
| 1997 | 2.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 1998 | 0.9416 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.2% |
| 1999 | 0.7937 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 2000 | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.9% |
| 2001 | 0.8878 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.3% |
| 2002 | 0.8206 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 2003 | 1.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +83.6% |
| 2004 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.7% |
| 2005 | 0.3632 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 2006 | 0.6591 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.5% |
| 2007 | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +130.6% |
| 2008 | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.9% |
| 2010 | 2.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.9% |
| 2011 | 12.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +366.2% |
| 2012 | 5.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.0% |
| 2013 | 9.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +76.7% |
| 2014 | 4.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.3% |
| 2015 | 3.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 2016 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.6% |
| 2017 | 5.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +190.9% |
| 2018 | 2.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.8% |
| 2019 | 1.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.4% |
| 2020 | 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2021 | 3.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +146.6% |
| 2022 | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.8% |
| 2023 | 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +136.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1022 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0404 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1749 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 0.3847 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1211 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9685 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4843 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7937 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3632 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zambia
- 71 Sudan 3.78 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 72 South Sudan 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 73 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.01 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 75 Tanzania, United Republic of 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 76 Iraq 2.43 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 77 Grenada 2.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Zambia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 395,416 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 5.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 50.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.17 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 25.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 25.84 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Zambia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Zambia was 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Zambia?
- The highest recorded value was 12.23 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Zambia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0404 current US$ per square kilometre in 1965.
- How does Zambia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
- Zambia ranks 74th out of 160 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per rising or falling in Zambia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 68.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zambia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.