Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia … Australia square in Tanzania
Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia … Australia square was 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per in Tanzania, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Tanzania recorded 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 100.7% on the previous year and down 79.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Tanzania peaked at 15.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.0903 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1970.
Tanzania ranks 75th of 160 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia … Australia square in Tanzania, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 0.1129 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0.1355 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 1967 | 0.1016 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1968 | 0.1129 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1969 | 0.1129 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0903 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0903 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0903 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.1693 current US$ per square kilometre | +87.5% |
| 1974 | 0.8918 current US$ per square kilometre | +426.7% |
| 1975 | 2.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +193.7% |
| 1976 | 0.8467 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.7% |
| 1977 | 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +116.0% |
| 1978 | 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.0% |
| 1979 | 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.2% |
| 1980 | 6.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +151.1% |
| 1981 | 8.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.9% |
| 1982 | 10.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.3% |
| 1983 | 11.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 1984 | 7.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.7% |
| 1985 | 4.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.7% |
| 1986 | 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.6% |
| 1987 | 2.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.6% |
| 1988 | 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.5% |
| 1989 | 4.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.3% |
| 1990 | 9.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +91.6% |
| 1991 | 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -79.3% |
| 1992 | 2.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.0% |
| 1993 | 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.9% |
| 1994 | 2.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.0% |
| 1995 | 1.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.4% |
| 1996 | 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.2% |
| 1997 | 1.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1998 | 0.8354 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.0% |
| 1999 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.2% |
| 2000 | 2.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +98.1% |
| 2001 | 2.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 2002 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.9% |
| 2003 | 0.5306 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.0% |
| 2004 | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +161.7% |
| 2005 | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.8% |
| 2006 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.9% |
| 2007 | 2.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +99.2% |
| 2008 | 2.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.4% |
| 2009 | 1.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 2010 | 6.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +314.6% |
| 2011 | 15.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +127.5% |
| 2012 | 9.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.1% |
| 2013 | 13.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.2% |
| 2014 | 6.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.2% |
| 2015 | 6.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2016 | 2.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.2% |
| 2017 | 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.1% |
| 2018 | 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 2019 | 2.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.3% |
| 2020 | 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.4% |
| 2021 | 2.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.1% |
| 2022 | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.0% |
| 2023 | 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.7% |
Tanzania compared with similar countries
- Tanzania's 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre, 93% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Tanzania's 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 2.02 current US$ per square kilometre, 1.4× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia … Australia square in Tanzania changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1974 | +426.7% | 0.1693 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8918 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1152 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1016 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1355 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0903 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 6.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8354 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5306 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 7.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania
- 72 South Sudan 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 73 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.01 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 74 Zambia 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 76 Iraq 2.43 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 77 Grenada 2.26 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 78 Mozambique 2.21 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Tanzania
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 9.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 37.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 34.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 54.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 121.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 37.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 16.94 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Tanzania?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per in Tanzania was 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Tanzania?
- The highest recorded value was 15.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per recorded in Tanzania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0903 current US$ per square kilometre in 1970.
- How does Tanzania rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per?
- Tanzania ranks 75th out of 160 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, australia (current us$), per rising or falling in Tanzania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 79.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tanzania data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 59 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.