East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Estonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
38.35 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia
2,555 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
38th
Estonia rank
37th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Estonia
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 2,555 current US$ per square kilometre against 38.35 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 2,517 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Estonia's figure about 66.6 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 38th and Estonia ranks 37th of 45 groups.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 14.67 current US$ per square kilometre 572.54 current US$ per square kilometre 557.87 current US$ per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 17.53 current US$ per square kilometre 1,339 current US$ per square kilometre 1,322 current US$ per square kilometre Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Estonia?
Estonia, at 2,555 current US$ per square kilometre against 38.35 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Estonia?
2,517 current US$ per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Estonia?
13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Estonia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 38th and Estonia ranks 37th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Estonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/estonia/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Estonia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.