Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 38.35 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
38.35 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 6.3%
Rank
38th
of 45 groups
All-time high
56.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
All-time low
0.0075 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1965
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) recorded 38.35 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in 2023.
That represents a change of up 6.3% on the previous year and up 23.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) peaked at 56.09 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0.0075 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1965.
That places East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) 38th out of 45 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.1093 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0992 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 1963 | 0.0521 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.5% |
| 1964 | 0.0226 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.6% |
| 1965 | 0.0075 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 1966 | 0.0911 current US$ per square kilometre | +1108.3% |
| 1967 | 0.1721 current US$ per square kilometre | +89.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0389 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.4% |
| 1969 | 0.2556 current US$ per square kilometre | +556.5% |
| 1970 | 0.4133 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.7% |
| 1971 | 0.162 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.8% |
| 1972 | 0.2581 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.3% |
| 1973 | 0.0867 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.4% |
| 1974 | 0.8001 current US$ per square kilometre | +823.2% |
| 1975 | 0.8422 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1976 | 0.6343 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.7% |
| 1977 | 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +171.9% |
| 1978 | 3.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +130.9% |
| 1979 | 4.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1980 | 2.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.4% |
| 1981 | 4.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.4% |
| 1982 | 3.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.6% |
| 1983 | 4.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.1% |
| 1984 | 2.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.2% |
| 1985 | 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1986 | 6.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +129.1% |
| 1987 | 10.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.3% |
| 1988 | 12.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 1989 | 8.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.2% |
| 1990 | 9.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.3% |
| 1991 | 8.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.6% |
| 1992 | 15.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.4% |
| 1993 | 8.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.7% |
| 1994 | 10.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 1995 | 17.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +74.2% |
| 1996 | 16.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.8% |
| 1997 | 16.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1998 | 17.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1999 | 14.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 2000 | 16.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2001 | 16.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2002 | 16.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2003 | 17.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2004 | 21.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.2% |
| 2005 | 26.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.4% |
| 2006 | 28.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2007 | 33.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 2008 | 31.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 2009 | 32.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2010 | 33.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2011 | 50.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.5% |
| 2012 | 39.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.2% |
| 2013 | 31.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.1% |
| 2014 | 31.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 34.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 2016 | 37.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2017 | 34.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 2018 | 45.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.4% |
| 2019 | 37.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.2% |
| 2020 | 56.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.8% |
| 2021 | 43.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.9% |
| 2022 | 36.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.6% |
| 2023 | 38.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0943 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0075 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2556 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0867 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 5.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 13.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 24.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 33.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 37.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 50.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 43.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 56.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- 35 Armenia 2,766 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Hungary 2,654 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Estonia 2,555 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Burundi 2,494 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Jordan 2,435 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Slovenia 2,422 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Rwanda 2,307 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 34.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 13.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 230.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 613.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 130.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 604.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 550.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 5.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.61 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) was 38.35 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 56.09 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0075 current US$ per square kilometre in 1965.
- How does East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 38th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 23.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.