East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
31.92 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Latvia
2,146 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
40th
Latvia rank
42nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Latvia
05001.0k1.5k2.0k197019962022

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 2,146 current US$ per square kilometre against 31.92 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 2,114 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 67.2 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 40th and Latvia ranks 42nd of 45 groups.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 12.86 current US$ per square kilometre 432.83 current US$ per square kilometre 419.97 current US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 14.12 current US$ per square kilometre 1,159 current US$ per square kilometre 1,145 current US$ per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Latvia?
Latvia, at 2,146 current US$ per square kilometre against 31.92 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Latvia?
2,114 current US$ per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Latvia?
13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 40th and Latvia ranks 42nd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-european-union-institutions-current-us-per-square/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/latvia/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 9,345 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.