Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 31.92 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) stood at 31.92 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 12.6% on the previous year and down 12.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 50.96 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0.0405 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1973.
That places East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) 40th out of 45 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.2848 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0.043 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.9% |
| 1972 | 0.2019 current US$ per square kilometre | +369.1% |
| 1973 | 0.0405 current US$ per square kilometre | -79.9% |
| 1974 | 0.7088 current US$ per square kilometre | +1650.0% |
| 1975 | 0.7778 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1976 | 0.5936 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.7% |
| 1977 | 1.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +174.2% |
| 1978 | 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +142.7% |
| 1979 | 4.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1980 | 2.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.9% |
| 1981 | 4.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.7% |
| 1982 | 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.5% |
| 1983 | 4.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.0% |
| 1984 | 2.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.3% |
| 1985 | 2.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1986 | 5.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +119.8% |
| 1987 | 9.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.1% |
| 1988 | 10.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 1989 | 5.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.2% |
| 1990 | 9.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.7% |
| 1991 | 8.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.1% |
| 1992 | 14.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.2% |
| 1993 | 8.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.0% |
| 1994 | 9.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1995 | 16.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.1% |
| 1996 | 15.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1997 | 13.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 1998 | 13.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 1999 | 11.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 2000 | 14.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.8% |
| 2001 | 14.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2002 | 12.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 2003 | 13.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2004 | 15.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 2005 | 22.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.1% |
| 2006 | 26.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 2007 | 31.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 2008 | 29.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 2009 | 32.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 2010 | 31.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2011 | 47.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.0% |
| 2012 | 36.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.7% |
| 2013 | 26.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.4% |
| 2014 | 27.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2015 | 31.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 2016 | 35.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.4% |
| 2017 | 31.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 2018 | 41.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.8% |
| 2019 | 33.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.7% |
| 2020 | 50.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.6% |
| 2021 | 36.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.3% |
| 2022 | 31.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.6% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1974 | +1650.0% | 0.0405 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7088 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1972 | +369.1% | 0.043 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2019 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0405 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 5.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 12.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 21.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 34.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 26.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 47.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 39.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 50.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- 37 Estonia 2,555 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Burundi 2,494 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Jordan 2,435 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Slovenia 2,422 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Rwanda 2,307 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Latvia 2,146 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2,134 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 24.48 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 12.89 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 78.05 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 507.00 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 114.85 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.36 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 35.33 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 139.25 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -13.95 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.26 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) was 31.92 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 50.96 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0405 current US$ per square kilometre in 1973.
- How does East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 40th out of 45 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 12.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.