Eswatini vs Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per

Eswatini
452.77 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Upper middle income
35.33 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
36th
Upper middle income rank
34th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Upper middle income
-2000200400196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 452.77 current US$ per square kilometre against 35.33 current US$ per square kilometre in Upper middle income, a difference of 417.44 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 12.8 times Upper middle income's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Upper middle income ahead.

Eswatini ranks 36th and Upper middle income ranks 34th of 167 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Upper middle income in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Upper middle income Difference Ahead
1980s 15.64 current US$ per square kilometre 9.09 current US$ per square kilometre 6.55 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s -7.56 current US$ per square kilometre 16.33 current US$ per square kilometre 23.89 current US$ per square kilometre Upper middle income
2000s 7.97 current US$ per square kilometre 20.58 current US$ per square kilometre 12.61 current US$ per square kilometre Upper middle income
2010s 11.2 current US$ per square kilometre 34.79 current US$ per square kilometre 23.59 current US$ per square kilometre Upper middle income
2020s 121.45 current US$ per square kilometre 47.55 current US$ per square kilometre 73.9 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per, Eswatini or Upper middle income?
Eswatini, at 452.77 current US$ per square kilometre against 35.33 current US$ per square kilometre in Upper middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per between Eswatini and Upper middle income?
417.44 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Upper middle income?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Upper middle income rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
Eswatini ranks 36th and Upper middle income ranks 34th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-france-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-france-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/upper-middle-income/">Eswatini vs Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 9,160 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.