Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per was 35.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
35.33 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 33.5%
Rank
34th
of 45 groups
All-time high
54.37 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
All-time low
0 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Upper middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Upper middle income recorded 35.33 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is down 33.5% on the previous year and up 11.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Upper middle income peaked at 54.37 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Upper middle income ranks 34th of 45 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.1049 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.4046 current US$ per square kilometre | +285.7% |
| 1964 | 0.7942 current US$ per square kilometre | +96.3% |
| 1965 | 0.482 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.3% |
| 1966 | 0.4895 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1967 | 0.8916 current US$ per square kilometre | +82.1% |
| 1968 | 0.8166 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 1969 | 0.6543 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.9% |
| 1970 | 3.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +467.6% |
| 1971 | 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1972 | 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 1973 | 3.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 1974 | 4.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.4% |
| 1975 | 4.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1976 | 3.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.8% |
| 1977 | 2.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 1978 | 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.3% |
| 1979 | 4.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1980 | 6.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.5% |
| 1981 | 9.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.9% |
| 1982 | 7.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.5% |
| 1983 | 7.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 1984 | 6.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1985 | 5.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.8% |
| 1986 | 8.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.0% |
| 1987 | 10.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 1988 | 13.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.3% |
| 1989 | 15.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 1990 | 20.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.6% |
| 1991 | 24.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 1992 | 20.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 1993 | 18.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 1994 | 17.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1995 | 15.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.9% |
| 1996 | 15.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1997 | 10.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.0% |
| 1998 | 9.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 1999 | 10.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 2000 | 5.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.8% |
| 2001 | 4.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.0% |
| 2002 | 11.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +139.4% |
| 2003 | 12.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 2004 | 10.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.6% |
| 2005 | 28.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +174.6% |
| 2006 | 37.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.0% |
| 2007 | 36.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2008 | 31.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 2009 | 25.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.6% |
| 2010 | 32.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.1% |
| 2011 | 40.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 2012 | 40.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2013 | 31.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.4% |
| 2014 | 39.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 2015 | 33.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.0% |
| 2016 | 27.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.6% |
| 2017 | 43.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.7% |
| 2018 | 39.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 2019 | 18.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.9% |
| 2020 | 47.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +155.8% |
| 2021 | 54.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 2022 | 53.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2023 | 35.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.5153 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8916 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 3.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 9.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 16.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 20.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 37.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 34.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 18.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 43.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 47.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 35.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 54.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 31 Gambia 530.59 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Philippines 515.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Armenia 498.58 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Israel 492.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Guinea 456.03 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Eswatini 452.77 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Vanuatu 442.04 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Upper middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 264.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 114.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.36 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 24.06 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 518.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.80 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 607.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 175.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.85 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Upper middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Upper middle income was 35.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 54.37 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Upper middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
- Upper middle income ranks 34th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.