East Asia & Pacific vs Gambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per

East Asia & Pacific
5.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
26.32 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
East Asia & Pacific rank
38th
Gambia rank
41st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Gambia
0100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 26.32 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.07 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 21.25 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 5.2 times East Asia & Pacific's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Gambia ahead.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 38th and Gambia ranks 41st of 44 groups.

Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Gambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0131 current US$ per square kilometre 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre 3.94 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 0.7238 current US$ per square kilometre 145.13 current US$ per square kilometre 144.41 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre 86.86 current US$ per square kilometre 85.07 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 3.71 current US$ per square kilometre 24.6 current US$ per square kilometre 20.9 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 5.18 current US$ per square kilometre 17.12 current US$ per square kilometre 11.94 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 4.74 current US$ per square kilometre 24.17 current US$ per square kilometre 19.43 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per, East Asia & Pacific or Gambia?
Gambia, at 26.32 current US$ per square kilometre against 5.07 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per between East Asia & Pacific and Gambia?
21.25 current US$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Gambia?
42 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2022.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Gambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, norway (current us$), per?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 38th and Gambia ranks 41st of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Gambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-norway-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/gambia-the/">East Asia & Pacific vs Gambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 7,513 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.